Search for: "American Home Assurance Co" Results 401 - 420 of 488
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Oct 2009, 5:02 am by James Edward Maule
Would it make sense to ask supervisors and co-workers the same question not only of themselves but of others in the office? [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 6:23 am
2)   Did policies encouraging home ownership lead to relaxed standards which contributed to the crisis? [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 1:53 am
American Home Assurance Co., defendant-appellant APPELLATE DIVISIONFIRST DEPARTMENTInsurance Law'AirTrain' Maker Breached Policy by Circumventing Safety Systems in Test Causing Derailment, Damage Slattery Skanska Inc., plaintiffs v. [read post]
1 Sep 2009, 10:52 am by velvel
’” Congress placed upon the IRS the duty of enforcing the “fiduciary standards” that would assure the desired safety of retirement incomes. [read post]
31 Aug 2009, 7:32 am
Jess Ayala Cota and other employees assured their clients that this was legal. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 5:44 am
There is no set of facts under which such events can possibly be construed as "sudden and accidental" (see, Consolidated Edison of New York, Inc. v American Home Assur. [read post]
18 Jul 2009, 7:31 am
This post is by my colleagues Mark Schonfeld, John Sturc, Barry Goldsmith, Eric Creizman, Jennifer Colgan Halter, Akita St. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 8:47 am
I want to thank the Co-Chairs, Subcommittee and Committee Staff for the opportunity to participate in today's discussion on the current state of the personal health record (PHR) and the future use of this and other health care technology tools by the health care industry and the health care consumer.My name is Bob Coffield. [read post]
25 May 2009, 11:56 pm
Oh, and regarding the recent American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, how about giving us some of that bail-out money? [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog)   Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
7 May 2009, 6:14 am
There were assurances to the US government that he would serve his sentence in Scotland. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 5:28 pm
Warner, a Republican from Virginia, who was the co-author of last year’s Warner-Lieberman Bill which covered much of the same ground as this bill, echoed Gore. [read post]
29 Mar 2009, 1:31 pm
Co., 240 AD2d 396; Cohen v Employers Reinsurance Corp., 117 AD2d 435; George Muhlstock & Co. v American Home Assur. [read post]