Search for: "Appeal of Means (franklin)"
Results 401 - 420
of 499
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jul 2019, 1:05 pm
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in Trump v. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 2:32 pm
Courts lean towards one concept but find themselves appealing to the other when difficulties emerge. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 1:09 pm
Quinn: I suppose that means longer? [read post]
17 May 2019, 4:53 pm
In Franklin v. [read post]
13 Feb 2020, 2:32 pm
Court of Appeals for the D.C. [read post]
9 Aug 2020, 9:03 pm
That may be so, but it does not mean that presidential words about the Court have no effect. [read post]
11 May 2010, 9:09 pm
All came to the court from service on the federal courts of appeal. [read post]
17 May 2019, 4:53 pm
In Franklin v. [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 9:05 pm
In 1933, President Franklin D. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 5:49 pm
Franklin's undergraduate work was at the University of Sydney (1971-75). [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 4:30 am
Appealing to the memory of their former masters could be a useful tactic to win cases, therefore, but litigation itself could also shift the relations of former masters and former slaves as well.On my website, www.melissamilewski.com, I have put up transcripts and scans of the case files of a number of cases involving former slaves and former masters (including the cases mentioned here). [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 11:18 am
Plaintiffs had argued that Congress had already legislated specific means to address certain countries’ failure to provide adequate information: Such measures included: (a) Individual consular assessments and requirements that individuals supply such information and (b) a visa waiver program to apply pressure to recalcitrant countries. [read post]
27 Apr 2024, 2:40 pm
The holdings of the principal cases Trump cites for the "clear statement" rule, especially Franklin v. [read post]
23 Dec 2012, 3:26 pm
However, the majority did not discuss the meaning of Bayesian probability analysis theory. [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 3:00 am
(IPKat) OHIM Board of Appeal rules on functional designs: R 690/2007-3 (Class 99) X5 and CEO Are they still riding side by side – Munich District Court and Turin District Court draw deviating conclusions in design dispute (Class 99) USPTO’s transparency puts Europe to shame (IAM) EU community patent and UPLS: Will there be a political breakthrough soon? [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 11:40 am
” They are not a substitute for law but a means for filling in gaps of law that is no longer able to specify with any degree of detail the rules necessary to meet the sometimes needs of regulation in highly technical fields. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 3:10 pm
Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit in Chicago. [read post]
9 Jul 2011, 8:18 pm
Different does not have to mean deficient. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:24 pm
Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit in Chicago. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 1:08 pm
Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit. [read post]
