Search for: "Appeal of Merchant's Market"
Results 401 - 409
of 409
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jul 2017, 5:32 pm
CAVEAT FOR READERS IN TEXAS: This action by targets of National Collegiate Student Loan collection suits was filed in a different state and in a different circuit, and involves state law claim in addition to federal FDCPA claims, and unfair collection claims under the FDCPA heavily implicated state law which varies among states. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:55 am
Bowie knives are back in constitutional law news these days, after a very long absence. [read post]
14 Jul 2018, 6:42 am
My email inbox has gotten out of control, and I had to declare partial email bankruptcy. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 4:07 pm
The nature of the data is potentially commercially sensitive such that it could provide merchants with a competitive advantage. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 2:29 pm
There are lots of "found objects" from which a variety of narrative bricolage may be fashioned and inserted into the markets for the shaping of reality. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 5:40 am
(Randy Barnett) Today marks the 160th anniversary of one of Frederick Douglass’s most moving speeches, “What July 4th Means to the Negro. [read post]
6 Feb 2022, 10:49 am
But it is likely ignored as window dressing and stage setting without significance by outside readers who get there quite unsurprisingly by rejecting the narrative in favor of their own triumph of a self critical diverse and contested democratic markets based liberal democratic identity based multi-culture ]The sides call on all States to pursue well-being for all and, with these ends, to build dialogue and mutual trust, strengthen mutual… [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 6:05 am
The debate over big data, privacy and its implications for democracy came to Ottawa last week as the International Grand Committee brought together the world’s biggest technology companies, politicians from around the world, and leading thinkers. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 7:03 am
Second, the Quill rule creates market distortions between brick-and-mortar and online retailers–“a judicially created tax shelter,” in the Court’s words–and an incentive to avoid physical presence in multiple states purely for tax avoidance reasons.[5] Third, the physical presence standard is arbitrary and formalistic, rather than looking at the substance of a law’s compliance burdens or discriminatory effect. [read post]
