Search for: "Appeal of Merchant's Market"
Results 401 - 409
of 409
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Aug 2007, 2:40 am
Title616
A9244
Heastie -- Relates to the termination of a residential lease by a victim of domestic violence 615
A9206
Barclay -- Authorizes the town of Camillus to change the retirement plan that it offers to police officers and firefighters 614
A9145
Schimminger -- Extends the provisions relating to the registration of kegs 613
A9002A
Sweeney (MS) -- Creates the New York state sea level rise task force 612
… [read post]
6 Jun 2007, 6:02 pm
" But if the merchants merely took orders, the plaintiffs "are the first purchasers and may recover for the cathode purchases they made from the integrated producers with the assistance of the merchants. [read post]
21 May 2007, 11:54 am
" The court of appeals held that merchants cannot sue under this provision because they do not "engage[] in any transaction" on the exchange; only their customers do, the court concluded. [read post]
17 May 2007, 9:50 am
Instead, the petition looks at the court of appeals' reasoning and asserts that the principle premise of the court's holding - that only customers, and not merchants, engage in "transactions" on the futures commodity exchange - conflicts with the recognition by other courts of appeals that merchants themselves are the entities buying and selling futures (albeit for the benefit of their clients). [read post]
17 May 2007, 5:04 am
It is the normal way the public uses a mark which is applied by a manufacturer or a merchant to a particular product, and, as indicated, trademark concepts do not require the condemnation of normal commercial language. [read post]
9 May 2007, 1:34 pm
None other than whether a product is "merchantable. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 11:30 am
Law of New Trials, and Other Rehearings; Including Writs of Error, Appeals etc. 1 v. (1872) Hilliard, Francis. [read post]
11 Mar 2007, 12:24 pm
On appeal, the Appellate Court reversed the lower court's conviction and concluded that the shoplifting statute was inapplicable to this case. [read post]
8 Dec 2006, 8:06 am
Paycom abandoned its Section 2 claims on appeal. [read post]
