Search for: "Appeal of Thomas (william)" Results 401 - 420 of 1,549
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 May 2019, 7:15 am by Andrew Hamm
Mark Walsh has a “view” from the courtroom for yesterday’s session, which included the traditional presentation of Attorney General William Barr to the court. [read post]
28 May 2019, 2:08 pm by Mark Walsh
I have the privilege to present to the court the 85th Attorney General of the United States, the Honorable William P. [read post]
14 May 2019, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Justice Thomas is correct that the Court has drawn inferences from structure and history. [read post]
14 May 2019, 7:29 am by Andrew Hamm
In 1910, William Howard Taft, a Republican, nominated two Democrats to the court. [read post]
10 May 2019, 2:00 am by Christopher Tyner
  This week the North Carolina Court of Appeals vacated Chad Copley’s conviction for first-degree murder and granted him a new trial because of a prosecutor’s comments during closing arguments suggesting that race may have been a factor in Copley’s decision to shoot Kouren-Rodney Bernard Thomas in 2016. [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 Thomas Vaughn, the high school principal in the 2015-2016 school year (“principal”),[2] attests that petitioner’s assignment consisted of two periods of mathematics extension laboratory, two periods supervising the ISS room, two “planning periods,”[3] and a “lunch period. [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 Thomas Vaughn, the high school principal in the 2015-2016 school year (“principal”),[2] attests that petitioner’s assignment consisted of two periods of mathematics extension laboratory, two periods supervising the ISS room, two “planning periods,”[3] and a “lunch period. [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 Thomas Vaughn, the high school principal in the 2015-2016 school year (“principal”),[2] attests that petitioner’s assignment consisted of two periods of mathematics extension laboratory, two periods supervising the ISS room, two “planning periods,”[3] and a “lunch period. [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 Thomas Vaughn, the high school principal in the 2015-2016 school year (“principal”),[2] attests that petitioner’s assignment consisted of two periods of mathematics extension laboratory, two periods supervising the ISS room, two “planning periods,”[3] and a “lunch period. [read post]
5 May 2019, 8:18 am by John Floyd
  If Trump should lose any legal challenge in the D.C. district court, his personal Attorney General, the Honorable William Pelham Barr, will appeal to the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia where he was face a court of 7 Democratic appointees and four Republican appointees—and a judicial setting where Judge Bates’ interpretations of constitutional law and respect for the rule of law is held in high esteem. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 4:30 am by David Oscar Markus
The TTAB stressed that consideration of the constitutionality of Section 2(a) was beyond the scope of jurisdiction of the TTAB.On appeal, the U.S. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 1:44 pm by Mark Walsh
An amicus brief on Brunetti’s side from the Cato Institute, besides offering its own thoughtful take on the importance of vulgar language in society, directs readers to a fascinating article in a 2012 issue of the William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal by Thomas Krattenmaker, who was a law clerk to Justice John Marshall Harlan. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 7:05 am by Ronald Collins
Arizona (1966), despite a forceful dissent by Justice Antonin Scalia joined by Justice Clarence Thomas. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 4:10 am by Edith Roberts
William Goren analyzes the argument at Understanding the ADA. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 10:25 pm by Alana Bevan
Attorney General William Barr submitted a letter to the U.S. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 8:56 am by Ronald Collins
Then there are quasi-biographies such as those by Thomas Healy (2013, pp. 336) and Brad Snyder (2017, pp. 824). [read post]
22 Mar 2019, 5:22 am by Lyle Denniston
The issue could return to the Supreme Court; the Court’s prior ruling in the Virginia case, Williams v. [read post]