Search for: "Arnold Doe" Results 401 - 420 of 2,485
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Nov 2019, 11:30 am by John Elwood
Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit concluded that it does; the Patent and Trademark Office argues it does not. [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 12:26 am
Referring to Arnold J (as he then was) in Sky Plc v Skykick UK Ltd in the High Court (the available relevant law at the time of application), even though there was no express requirement for intention to use a trade mark when registering it, such an application could constitute bad faith. [read post]
3 Nov 2019, 6:51 am by Gregory Forman
App. 2013) (Alabama was not home state for UCCJEA jurisdiction where mother moved to Michigan prior to child’s birth); Arnold v. [read post]
30 Oct 2019, 10:14 am by Matthew R. Arnold, Esq.
Board Certified Family Law Specialist Matt Arnold answers the question: “Do I need an attorney to get a Divorce in North Carolina? [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 4:00 pm by Gerry Riskin
As Arnold also said, “And, no, redesignating ‘Senior Statesmen’ as ‘Senior Statespeople’ does not make up for it (especially when they are all men). [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 4:00 pm by Gerry Riskin
As Arnold also said, “And, no, redesignating ‘Senior Statesmen’ as ‘Senior Statespeople’ does not make up for it (especially when they are all men). [read post]
27 Oct 2019, 8:23 am
 Others In 'Richard Arnold to be sworn in as Lord Justice of Appeal on Thursday', Eleonora Rosati, on behalf of the IPKat team, congratulated Sir Richard on his appointment and looks forward to commenting on his future judgments as Lord Justice of Appeal. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 1:23 am by Cameron Malone-Brown
It appears that this opinion does not fall entirely on the side of either party, so there may be a cautious optimism from both parties awaiting the CJEU decision. [read post]
20 Oct 2019, 5:37 am by Florian Mueller
First things first: CONGRATULATIONS to now-Lord Justice Richard Arnold, who was sworn in a few days ago as a new IP judge at the UK Court of Appeal. [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 4:44 pm
Why Issuing Certificates of Origin Electronically Does Not Equal Electronic Certificates of Origin? [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 10:47 am
As Arnold J remarked in his referring decision [here], the case raises important issues of European trade mark law, a sentiment shared by the A-G in the opening paragraphs of the conclusion. [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 2:26 am by Peter Groves
That said, the term "computer software" does not meet the standard. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 7:51 am by Bona Law PC
(Though, like the first article, this one does not quite reach the antitrust issues, as the initial challenges were brought under contract law.) [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 12:38 pm by John Elwood
Section 20913(d) does not violate the constitutional nondelegation doctrine. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 4:32 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In addition, defendants note that prior to serving the Bill of Particulars, Longhi retained Arnold E. [read post]