Search for: "Asbestos Products Liability v."
Results 401 - 420
of 552
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Nov 2010, 6:08 am
Allstate Insurance Company is not a bad faith case, the court’s analysis of the discovery issues caught my attention due to my recent posts.In Owens-Corning, the insured and liability insurer filed cross-motions to compel discovery in an insurance coverage dispute over asbestos products liability claims. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 9:46 pm
Chesterton Company: the plaintiff claimed that her husband was exposed to asbestos in airborne dust and his use of asbestos-containing products while working at power plants. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 12:36 pm
Dukes v. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 3:08 pm
In one case, In re New York County Data Entry Worker Product Liability Litigation, No. 14003/92, 1994 WL 87529 (N.Y. [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 12:53 pm
USF&G resisted coverage for the asbestos claims, both on the basis that it did not insure Western MacArthur and that its policies had been lost and had not been demonstrated to have products liability insurance. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 9:34 am
Summers v. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 8:46 am
Co. v. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am
We're talking about the Restatement (Third) of Torts, Products Liability §2, to be precise. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 3:23 pm
A recent court case, Saller v Crown Cork & Seal Company, reaffirms a product liability law that protects California asbestos victims and other victims of defective products. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 6:00 am
In a California strict product liability case, the plaintiff gets his choice of ways to prove the product was defective. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 2:41 pm
Alleged negligent failure to test could not be causal when all product liability claims dismissed. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 11:15 am
Although the demolition or renovation of a single-family residence is exempt from Asbestos NESHAP requirements, the exemption does not apply where the demolition is part of a larger commercial project. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am
– Trading Markets.com, July 21, 2010 Consistent with Section 122 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. 9622(d), and 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby given that on July 16, 2010, the United States lodged a Consent Decree with 163 defendants (each of which is identified in the proposed Decree) in United States of America v. [read post]
17 Jul 2010, 10:13 pm
Wet cellulose materials, including paper and paper products including ceiling tile, wood, and wallpaper are conducive to mold growth. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 2:39 pm
App. 2003) (asbestos); Edwards v. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 7:59 pm
Brown and David Matusow, Bahr, et al. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 10:44 am
In the case of Cole v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 6:02 am
Co. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 6:02 am
Co. v. [read post]
14 May 2010, 1:58 am
The losses related to liabilities on products such as silicon breast implants, products derived from contaminated blood and asbestos exposure. [read post]
