Search for: "B. Bell" Results 401 - 420 of 1,931
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Nov 2018, 9:00 pm by Vikram David Amar
And suppose most of Candidate B’s voters also prefer Candidate C to Candidate A. [read post]
28 Nov 2018, 4:06 am by Edith Roberts
” At the Yale Journal on Regulation’s Notice & Comment blog, Bernard Bell offers the second in a series of posts on PDR Network, LLC v. [read post]
27 Nov 2018, 4:01 am by Edith Roberts
At the Yale Journal on Regulation’s Notice & Comment blog, Bernard Bell kicks off a series of posts on PDR Network, LLC v. [read post]
25 Nov 2018, 7:31 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
This standard of patently unreasonable is only possible because Bill 22 renders the tribunal one of specialized expertise in these auto claims under s. 56.7(1), and incorporates the privative clause provision in s. 58 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, (2)In a judicial review proceeding relating to expert tribunals under subsection (1) (a) a finding of fact or law or an exercise of discretion by the tribunal in respect of a matter over which it has exclusive jurisdiction under a… [read post]
22 Nov 2018, 2:08 pm by David J. Halberg, Esq.
If a driver goes more than a few seconds without their hand on the wheel, a warning bell starts to ding. [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 5:34 pm by Mary Whisner
A and B being engaged to be married, the uncle of B promised A that if he would marry B, he (the uncle) would pay A an annuity of $500- during the life of B. [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 10:29 am by David Kris
” Based on “the assurance of Attorney General Bell . . . that he would personally continue to approve applications under [FISA] until standards of review have been well established,” Congress enacted “a modified version of the Administration’s proposal. [read post]
16 Nov 2018, 5:55 am by Anthony Gaughan
The filing also invokes the political question doctrine, raises a Rule 12(b)(3) venue issue, and even works in a 12(b)(6) reference to the strict pleading standard articulated in Bell Atlantic v. [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 9:33 pm by Lisa Ouellette
" Congress wants to receive a report on the study results within a year.There is already great empirical work on gender and racial gaps in patenting, including the "lost Einsteins" work by Alex Bell, Raj Chetty, Xavier Jaravel, Neviana Petkova, and John Van Reenen and Colleen Chien's Inequality, Innovation, and Patents. [read post]
28 Oct 2018, 9:43 am by Jenny Schell
Ashford for the purpose of determining: (a) whether the proposed settlement is fair, reasonable, and adequate and should be finally approved by the Court; and (b) whether to issue a final judgment order. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 8:45 am by Bill Marler
Ashford for the purpose of determining: (a) whether the proposed settlement is fair, reasonable, and adequate and should be finally approved by the Court; and (b) whether to issue a final judgment order. [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 7:48 am by Bill Marler
Ashford for the purpose of determining: (a) whether the proposed settlement is fair, reasonable, and adequate and should be finally approved by the Court; and (b) whether to issue a final judgment order. [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 7:11 am by Leah West
Bell reports that Kurdish forces want the Canadian government to take responsibility for its citizens in their custody. [read post]
20 Oct 2018, 9:37 am by Bill Marler
Ashford for the purpose of determining: (a) whether the proposed settlement is fair, reasonable, and adequate and should be finally approved by the Court; and (b) whether to issue a final judgment order. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 8:24 pm by Bill Marler
Ashford for the purpose of determining: (a) whether the proposed settlement is fair, reasonable, and adequate and should be finally approved by the Court; and (b) whether to issue a final judgment order. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 2:00 pm by Bill Marler
Ashford for the purpose of determining: (a) whether the proposed settlement is fair, reasonable, and adequate and should be finally approved by the Court; and (b) whether to issue a final judgment order. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 12:02 pm by News Desk
Ashford presiding, will conduct a final approval hearing on Dec. 11, 2018 to determine (a) whether the proposed settlement is fair, reasonable, and adequate and for final approval by the Court; and (b) whether to issue a final judgment order. [read post]
17 Oct 2018, 6:38 am by Eric Caligiuri
In the case, the Defendant argued that the Plaintiff’s complaint for direct patent infringement should be dismissed because the complaint fails to meet the pleading standards set forth by the Supreme Court in Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 4:16 am by Edith Roberts
” At the Yale Journal on Regulation’s Notice & Comment blog, Bernard Bell offers the last in a series of posts on Food Marketing Institute v. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 8:00 pm by Bill Marler
Thursday, October 11, and at the Earl Bell Community Center located at 1212 S. [read post]