Search for: "Baker v. U.S. District Court" Results 401 - 420 of 772
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2015, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
In the case of Ryan v Random House Australia [2015] NSWDC 31, the District Court of New South Wales struck out a number of imputations in a libel action brought by a 95 year old plaintiff in respect of a book dealing with his activities in the 1970s. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 5:18 pm
It seems quite likely, as one district court suggested in passing in 1964, that the terms of the statute are both unconstitutionally vague and in any event unlikely to survive the far stricter standards contemporary courts place on such content-based restrictions on speech…. [3.] [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 9:46 am by Tara Hofbauer
The Post reports on Loretta Lynch, the U.S. attorney for the southern district of New York, whose confirmation hearings to become the U.S. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 10:52 am by Maureen Johnston
Personhuballah 14-518Issue: (1) Whether the court below erred in failing to make the required finding that race rather than politics predominated in Virginia Congressional District 3, where there is no dispute that politics explains the enacted plan; (2) whether the court below erred in relieving plaintiffs of their burden to show an alternative plan that achieves the General Assembly's political goals, is comparably consistent with traditional districting… [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 10:03 am
It’s clear in the early returns that district courts are not following the Sixth Circuit’s lead on either Baker v. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 3:09 pm by Lyle Denniston
  It remains one of only three decisions in federal trial courts to uphold a ban, but the judges in the other two did not address the issue directly, finding that they had no authority to consider the issue because they were bound by a one-line Supreme Court decision in 1972 (Baker v. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 3:12 pm by Lyle Denniston
   The state used sixteen of the twenty-one pages in its application to argue that point, including assertions that both Baker v. [read post]