Search for: "Barber v. Barber" Results 401 - 420 of 498
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Mar 2010, 7:34 am by Dave
In particular, the problem of Fry J's well-known five probanda in Willmott v Barber (1880) 15 Ch D 96, at 105, which has bedevilled this area in the past, is again at stake here because eg it was not known whether the Defendants' predecessor in title had made a mistake as to his legal rights (probanda 1). [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 3:51 am by sally
Barber v Croydon London Borough Council Court of Appeal “A local housing authority had acted unreasonably in seeking possession against a mentally impaired tenant for anti-social behaviour when it failed to take into account the possibility that his behaviour might have been produced by his mental impairment. [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 6:29 pm by Anna Christensen
Quon, reply briefs have been added to the pages for Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha, Barber v. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 6:02 am by Adam Chandler
Barrie Barber of the Saginaw News has the story. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 6:00 am by Erin Miller
Lett (09-338), and Barber v. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 9:50 am by michael
Barber v Croydon London Borough Council – WLR Daily [2010] EWCA Civ 51; [2010] WLR (D) 39 “A local housing authority had acted unreasonably in seeking possession against a mentally impaired tenant for anti-social behaviour when it failed to take into account the possibility that the tenant’s mental impairment might have given rise to his behaviour. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 4:02 am by traceydennis
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) BW Gas AS v JAS Shipping Ltd [2010] EWCA Civ 68 (11 February 2010) Kulkarni v Manor Credit (Davenham) Ltd [2010] EWCA Civ 69 (11 February 2010) Humphreys v Revenue and Customs [2010] EWCA Civ 56 (11 February 2010) Ewing v Director of Public Prosecutions & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 70 (11 February 2010) Barber v London Borough of Croydon [2010] EWCA Civ 51 (11 February 2010) West Sussex County Council v… [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 3:07 am by traceydennis
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Gibson & Ors v Sheffield City Council [2010] EWCA Civ 63 (10 February 2010) Green v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 64 (10 February 2010) Online Catering Ltd v Acton & Anor [2010] EWCA Civ 58 (10 February 2010) Midgulf International Ltd v Groupe Chimique Tunisien [2010] EWCA Civ 66 (10 February 2010) Bascetta & Anor v Abbey National Plc [2010] EWCA Civ 62 (10… [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 7:00 am by Dave
In Barber v Croydon LBC [2010] EWCA Civ 51, the Court of Appeal found Croydon’s decision to pursue possession proceedings of a non-secure tenancy occupied by Mr Barber Wednesbury unreasonable, being by my estimation the third such successful use of a gateway (b) defence in the higher courts (after Doherty itself and McGlynn). [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 1:35 pm by Anna Christensen
Ratliff, Hui, O’Brien, and Barber v. [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 9:16 am by Randall Hodgkinson
About a year ago, we reported (here) that Pat Dunn won a new trial in a Barber County aggravated indecent liberties case in State v. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 9:43 am by Lyle Denniston
U.S. (09-6338) - authority of federal judges, in setting a new prison sentence, to go below Guideline range minimum Barber v. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 4:40 pm by Tom Goldstein
The question presented is whether that claim prevails on plain error review so long as there is "any possibility" the defendant was convicted for conduct prior to the statute's adoption, or whether a more stringent standard applies. ------- Title: Barber v. [read post]