Search for: "Bishop v Bishop" Results 401 - 420 of 1,393
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Nov 2010, 10:51 am
The rights and the duties of the Standing Committee, except as provided in the Constitution and Canons of the General Convention, may be prescribed by the Canons of the respective Dioceses.ARTICLE V. [read post]
14 Jun 2018, 10:35 am
" Two of them simply "reverse" the decision below (and one only in part), while only Justice Hearn declares the whole kit and caboodle to belong to her own denomination.The first two Justices would thus have overruled the leading South Carolina neutral principles case, All Saints Parish Waccamaw v. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 10:24 am
" Two of them simply "reverse" the decision below (and one only in part), while only Justice Hearn declares the whole kit and caboodle to belong to her own denomination.The first two Justices would thus have overruled the leading South Carolina neutral principles case, All Saints Parish Waccamaw v. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 11:07 am
I found the bill analysis particularly interesting in its reference to the Chicago Cubs and Rutgers (I believe that the case referred to in the legislative analysis is Shlensky v. [read post]
22 May 2014, 4:02 pm
Whether any bishop, including the Presiding Bishop, can act within a diocese outside of their own, without the consent of the Ecclesiastical Authority, i.e., the diocesan bishop or diocesan Standing Committee, and, if so, where in the governing documents such authority can be found? [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 12:33 am by Frank Cranmer
Without a doubt, he states, the canons provide for how a bishop is appointed and for how disputes relating to the election of bishops are resolved: “Courts cannot appoint a bishop for the Church. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 6:39 pm
Many other Bishops may not be aware of it just now, but they are going to face plenty of storms in their own dioceses after they return.This is not like General Convention 2003, when people had to read the news about the confirmation of V. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 3:56 pm by Steve Bainbridge
Keith writes: I have never been reconciled to the Delaware Supreme Court’s pronouncement in Gantler v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 3:36 pm
Smith, for the election and consecration of V. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
The U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals yesterday heard oral arguments in Perry v. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 5:55 pm
That one way is spelled out, in very clear words, in Article V of ECUSA's Constitution, and it has not changed in over 200 years. [read post]