Search for: "Board v. State"
Results 401 - 420
of 27,949
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jun 2015, 11:43 pm
FTC More recently, the United States Supreme Court decided a case called North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 11:43 pm
FTC More recently, the United States Supreme Court decided a case called North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
16 May 2014, 4:47 am
v=KuC-oXTwZFg&feature=youtu.be andhttp://www.youtube.com/watch? [read post]
8 Jan 2007, 6:09 am
In Matter of Aliperti v Trotta, the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Brookhaven denied an area variance for the size of a home after it had previously granted the same variance for the adjoining parcel several years earlier. [read post]
8 Jan 2007, 6:09 am
In Matter of Aliperti v Trotta, the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Brookhaven denied an area variance for the size of a home after it had previously granted the same variance for the adjoining parcel several years earlier. [read post]
14 Mar 2020, 9:15 am
See Customedia Techs., LLC v. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 4:25 pm
On December 12, 2011 the Supreme Court announced its decision in Judulang v. [read post]
15 Sep 2018, 5:23 am
Matter of Catskill Heritage Alliance, Inc. v Crossroads Ventures, LLC, 161 A.D.3d 1413 (N.Y. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 2:12 pm
Moritz links to this letter from Ohio Secretary of State Jon Husted, breaking the tie on the Hamilton County elections board, in what Ned Foley has called a "major ruling" on the meaning of Bush v. [read post]
28 Dec 2021, 1:48 am
(T 966/18) (14 July 2021)Bayer v Teva: Drug fo [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 8:44 am
Up until this case, that position had support in domestic law (see AL (Serbia) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] UKHL 42, [2008] 4 All ER 1127; R (Hooper) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2005] UKHL 29, [2006] 1 All ER 487; and R (S) v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire [2004] UKHL 39, [2004] 4 All ER 193). [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 8:40 pm
SBA Towers V, LLC v City of Madison Board of Zoning Appeals, 2017 WL 1927735 (SD IN 5/9/2017)Filed under: Wireless Communications [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:52 am
The Delaware Supreme Court’s opinion in Espinoza v. [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 3:30 am
In Alliance for Fair Board Recruitment v. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 8:00 am
Looney v. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 8:00 am
Looney v. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 4:27 am
In Secretary of State for Health v Servier Laboratories Ltd, where the loss arose because there were no generic equivalents of the invalidly-patented drug, the Supreme Court held that the "dealing requirement" laid down in OBG Ltd v Allan [2008] 1 AC 1, which states that the unlawful means should have affected the third party’s freedom to deal with the claimant, is a necessary element of the tort. [read post]
7 Jan 2024, 9:59 pm
United States Postal Service (2019)"; "Oil States Energy Services, LLC. v. [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 1:20 pm
Just as it did in other cases raising Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB)-related Takings Clause issues, the appellate court in Golden relied on its July 2019 decision in Celgene Corp. v. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 8:14 am
” Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board v. [read post]
