Search for: "Bono v. United States" Results 401 - 420 of 478
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Apr 2010, 3:44 pm by admin
The two companies will also pay a combined $3.3 million civil penalty to the United States as well as to Alabama and Louisiana, and $200,000 to Louisiana organ [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 6:09 am by Kenneth Anderson
I’ve refrained so far from commenting on the Liz Cheney — AQ7 ad, but I want to make one lengthy statement on it and, I hope, leave it at that. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 3:02 pm by almaraz
Professor Karlan has also participated in extensive pro bono litigation, primarily before the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 6:59 am by Orin Kerr
McCarthy is right that the United States was not formally at war with Britain at that time. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 10:43 am by Orin Kerr
United States, the pro bono case  I worked on over the last few months on whether the good faith exception of the Fourth Amendment applies to changing law. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 1:30 pm
Earlier: Bingham McCutchen's New 'Merit-Lockstep' Hybrid BINGHAM MCCUTCHEN - Law - Business - Services - United States [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 5:35 am by Jessie Canon
  Waxman has also developed an extensive pro bono practice, winning landmark decisions in the Supreme Court cases of Boumediene v. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 1:09 pm by Terry Lenamon
According to the Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution, "[i]n all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right . . . to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 12:46 pm by Orin Kerr
United States, a pro bono Fourth Amendment case that asks the Supreme Court to review whether the good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule applies to changing law. [read post]
20 Jan 2010, 2:40 pm by Orin Kerr
Back in October, I filed a pro bono petition for certiorari in McCane v. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 4:37 am
(IP Litigation Blog) District Court E D Virginia: Stay pending reexam denied because a stay would result in ‘more significant’ prejudice given the Court’s overall speed in disposing patent cases: Telecommunication Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 2:38 pm by Fabio Arcila
(You’ll be comforted to know that, according to the Court in United States v. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 2:30 pm
That was after he’d seen a brief Sungaila had filed in a domestic-violence-related lawsuit against the United States before the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 1:12 pm by Jeff Gamso
If there's no one, from the Governor to the United States Attorney to the indicted Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to the judges to the lawyers to the citizens, with the guts to take him on, then why waste more time or bandwidth on Joe Arpaio? [read post]