Search for: "Bridges v. State" Results 401 - 420 of 2,589
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jan 2021, 2:19 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Rather, the real winner is a growing cohort of lawyers who are filing meritless lawsuits in federal and state courts across the United States every time a merger or acquisition is announced or a corporate misfortune impacts a company’s share price… In the last five years, half of the nearly $23 billion in securities claims costs have gone to lawyers — both plaintiff and defense.[4]   Since 2017, the plaintiffs’ bar has expanded their corporate fraud… [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 2:41 pm by vforberger
The claim-filing processes in other states seek to bridge that gap. [read post]
5 Jan 2021, 8:24 am by Daily Record Staff
The car began overheating, and they were forced to pull to the side of the bridge on ... [read post]
27 Dec 2020, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
R (Bridges) v Chief Constable of South Wales Police [2020] 1 WLR 5037 The UK Court of Appeal’s finding that the South Wales Police Force’s use of facial recognition was unlawful. [read post]
18 Dec 2020, 1:42 pm by Sonia Gill
National elections should be reinforced with federal funds like any other important infrastructure essential to our society, including roads and bridges. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 12:45 am by CMS
In this post, Kenny Henderson, David Bridge, Jessica Foley and Devina Shah, who all work within the litigation and arbitration team at CMS, comment on the decision handed down last week by the UK Supreme Court in the matter Mastercard Incorporated and others v Walter Hugh Merricks CBE [2020] UKSC 51, which has significant implications for the UK competition law collective proceedings (or class actions) regime. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 6:56 pm by Gene Takagi
First, we heard closing args in the Fairbairn v. [read post]
  Thus, the taxpayer would receive a deduction in determining state taxable income for interest expense incurred to generate income that is not subject to tax in the state. [read post]
Kolarik II, “Implications of the Supreme Court’s Historic Decision in Wayfair,” State Tax Notes, July 9, 2018, p. 125. [4] See, e.g., Bridges v. [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 9:16 pm by Rik Lambers (Brinkhof)
The decision of the PI Judge of the District Court of The Hague in the Novartis v. [read post]