Search for: "Brown v. Ives" Results 401 - 420 of 466
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Apr 2009, 1:46 pm
D/B/A FORT BROWN CONDOSHARES AND LRI MANAGEMENT, INC. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 7:22 am
The only applicable exception is (b)(iv) regarding consent. [read post]
22 Feb 2009, 4:25 pm
No. 1-08-11, 2008-Ohio-5198 (ex post facto, retroactivity, double jeopardy, right to contract, history & purpose of juvenile court system) In re: Objection to Reclassification for Brown, 3rd Dist. [read post]
31 Dec 2008, 1:46 am
Massey of Brown, Drew & Massey, LLP, Casper, Wyoming.Representing Appellee Department of Revenue: Bruce A. [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 5:35 am
(Nearly) every majority opinion features a short introduction before it jumps into the standard I, II, III, IV, etc structure. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 11:07 pm
The test was devised by Justice Stewart in United States v. [read post]
22 Nov 2008, 3:48 pm
iii TABLE OF CONTENTS PRELIMINARY STATEMENT......................................... ii REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT.................................... iii TABLE OF CONTENTS............................................. iv TABLE OF AUTHORITIES........................................... v ARGUMENT IN REPLY.............................................. 1 ARGUMENT I..................................................... 1 Error One… [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 11:51 pm
  The court assessed damages as follows: (i) Non-pecuniary damages $     100,000.00 (ii) Loss of income/capacity: Future: Past:   $1,000,000.00 $     150,000.00 (iii) Cost of future care $        25,000.00 (iv) Loss of housekeeping capacity $        15,000.00 (v) Special… [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 1:18 pm
Introduction Part I and Part II of this series reviewed the historical background and technology of food irradiation, and the food safety implications relating to FDA’s recent approval of a new rule for use of ionizing irradiation as a processing step in fresh iceberg lettuce and spinach. [read post]
16 Oct 2008, 6:10 pm
Whether the Commission adequately considered all known costs and estimates of future costs of the plant; and IV. [read post]