Search for: "Bruce Schneier" Results 401 - 420 of 596
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Feb 2010, 9:38 am by David Bilinsky
However, Bruce Schneier, a security expert in an essay entitled: “Technology Shouldn’t Give Big Brother a Head Start” states: But that’s not the most serious misuse of a telecommunications surveillance infrastructure. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 5:54 pm by INFORRM
In an excellent article in the Guardian, Bruce Schneier talks about the role of engineers in the process. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 12:40 pm by Betsy McKenzie
“It’s nice to see the industry starting to grapple with these issues,” said Bruce Schneier, the author of “Secrets and Lies,” a book about computer and network security. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 12:01 pm by Wells Bennett
. *** Bruce Schneier is an internationally renowned security technologist, called a “security guru” by The Economist. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 9:19 am by Michael Froomkin
So what I want to know — since both Wikipedia and Bruce Schneier tells me it’s for real1 — is Are these guys paying the City for the right to put up these signs? [read post]
15 May 2012, 7:50 am by Kevin
Finally, another book (I get books in the mail, you see): Liars and Outliers, by security expert Bruce Schneier. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 4:50 pm by Stewart Baker
Apple says that would mean less privacy and security for users; Mark thinks there's something to that, but Bruce Schneier thinks that's hogwash. [read post]
22 May 2015, 11:38 am by Kevin
If you are interested in hearing about security issues from somebody who actually knows what he's talking about and makes complete sense, that'd be Bruce Schneier (blog, numerous books, op-ed pieces, etc.). [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 4:00 am by Sharon D. Nelson and John W. Simek
Noted security guru and cryptographer Bruce Schneier says “Stop trying to fix the user. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 5:07 pm by Stewart Baker
[Episode 296 of the Cyberlaw Podcast] This week's episode includes an interview with Bruce Schneier about his recent op-ed on privacy. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 2:34 pm by Duncan Hollis
 To answer it, US News assembled 7 experts who, with the exception of Bruce Schneier, replied in some form of the negative (see e.g. the responses of Herb Lin (no, or not yet), James Lewis (it’s not workable) Sean Lawson (it would be premature, unnecessary, and ineffective); Martin Libicki (focusing on international norms would be better); John Lindsay (it’s the wrong sort of solution); and Lawrence Muir (it’d be ineffective)). [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 10:57 am by Rekha Arulanantham
As Bruce Schneier aptly sums it up, “we do nothing wrong when we sing in the shower. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 2:36 pm by crule
Liars and Outliers by Bruce Schneier is available from Amazon.com [read post]
Privacy and security expert Bruce Schneier, who sits on the board of the Electronic Frontier Foundation and runs the security architecture at a data management company, wrote a rebuttal to Apple’s letter. [read post]
12 Apr 2014, 4:37 am by Jack Goldsmith
Bruce Schneier has a similar suggestion: [T]he NSA needs to be rebalanced so COMSEC (communications security) has priority over SIGINT (signals intelligence). [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 6:02 am by Sebastian Brady
Bruce Schneier made us a handy scorecard to help keep track of U.S. intelligence community leakers. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 7:00 am by Robert Chesney
Lunchtime Keynote: Bruce Schneier (Berkman Center, Harvard Law School) Bruce is a dynamic speaker, well-known for his capacity to break through the immediate details of technology and law in order to provide a larger, long-term perspective on the challenges to maintaining privacy in the evolving digital environment. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 4:00 am by Administrator
Each Thursday we present a significant excerpt, usually from a recently published book or journal article. [read post]
29 Dec 2013, 12:10 pm by Jane Chong
” This is the basic rule underlying Bruce Schneier’s observation that “[f]ree software wouldn’t fall under a liability regime because the writer and the user have no business relationship; they are not seller and buyer. [read post]