Search for: "C. G., Matter of"
Results 401 - 420
of 3,967
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Oct 2011, 5:01 pm
According to G 1/93 [16], if an undisclosed added feature, although limiting the scope of protection conferred by the patent, has to be considered as providing a technical contribution to the subject-matter of the claimed invention, it would give an unwarranted advantage to the patentee contrary to the purpose of A 123(2). [read post]
3 Mar 2013, 5:01 pm
It was found that the disclosure of the invention was of such a general nature that it deprived the skilled person of the information he/she needed to understand how to proceed from the first reaction value collected in step A through steps B, C and D to the determination on a probabilistic basis of the genotype of step E. [read post]
15 May 2018, 11:27 am
Nor is it enough for subject-matter eligibility that claimed techniques be novel and nonobvious in light of prior art, passing muster under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 3:01 pm
It follows that features (d), (f), (g) and (h) are not technical features of the claimed liquid formulation in the sense of R 29(1) and decision G 2/88. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 8:17 am
The cases of Ambrose, G and M deal with various challenges that have arisen since the ruling in Cadder v HM Advocate. [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 12:38 pm
The court therefore properly focused its analysis on the defendant’s incomplete discovery, failed compliance, and improper certification under Rules 37(c)(1) and 26(g). [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 12:38 pm
The court therefore properly focused its analysis on the defendant’s incomplete discovery, failed compliance, and improper certification under Rules 37(c)(1) and 26(g). [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 12:38 pm
The court therefore properly focused its analysis on the defendant’s incomplete discovery, failed compliance, and improper certification under Rules 37(c)(1) and 26(g). [read post]
16 May 2024, 3:30 am
More generally why do CEOs, boards, and managers (members of what C. [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 11:37 am
The list, effective November 25th, 2015, can be found below: Jonathan G. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 5:01 pm
According to the wording of R 76(2)(c) it is sufficient to indicate the evidence within the nine-month TFO. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 1:44 pm
Labor-Management Relations Richard C. [read post]
30 May 2014, 3:14 pm
There are allegations of improprieties by the agent in its handling of the matter; and h. [read post]
23 Mar 2024, 6:00 am
In determining “whether any advertising concerning a food or food product is false or misleading,” courts must also consider factors including—but not limited to—the following: “(a) subject matter; (b) visual content; (c) use of animated characters or child-oriented activities and incentives; (d) music or other audio content; (e) age of models; (f) presence of child celebrities or celebrities who appeal to children; (g) language; (h) competent… [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 9:00 pm
La présente demande (EP2) avait été rejetée pour cause de double brevetabilité car revendiquant, pour la division d'examen, le même objet que le brevet parent EP1.Tandis que EP1 revendique une seconde utilisation thérapeutique sous la forme d'une revendication de type suisse, EP2 revendique la même utilisation, mais sous la forme désormais admise d'une composition (Art 54(5) CBE).La Chambre examine ce que disent les… [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 4:00 am
G. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 9:52 am
For more information on Maryland divorce and child custody matters contact an experienced divorce attorney. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 2:57 pm
See Art. 66(g), UCMJ. [read post]
14 Sep 2022, 3:58 am
C. [read post]
4 May 2007, 2:56 am
[O]ther prior art references that fail to suggest a G+C content of greater than 60 percent . . . do little to offset the clear suggestion in the Barton application that complete codon substitution would rease in the G+C content of the codons in the genetic sequence. . . . [read post]
