Search for: "C. v. A." Results 401 - 420 of 62,049
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Feb 2009, 2:10 pm
It is the judgment of the Court of Justice in Case C-110/05 Commission v. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 2:27 am by sally
Interedil Srl (in liquidation) v Fallimento Interedil Srl and another Case C-396/09; [2011] WLR (D) 334 “The term ‘centre of a debtor’s main interests’ in article 3(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1346/2000 was to be interpreted by reference to European Union law, which attached greater importance to the place of the company’s central administration, in particular the place of its registered office. [read post]
17 May 2011, 2:07 am by sally
MSD Sharp & Dohme GmbH v Merckle GmbH (Case C-316/09); [2011] WLR (D) 159 “The dissemination on a website by a pharmaceutical undertaking of information relating to medicinal products available on medical prescription only, which consisted in the reproduction of the packaging, and in the literal and complete reproduction of the package leaflet or summary of the product’s characteristics, was not contrary to article 88(1)(a) of Parliament and Council Directive… [read post]
8 Jun 2008, 10:59 am
The Court of Justice handed down an important judgment in Case C-133/06 Parliament v. [read post]
20 Nov 2021, 8:54 am by Berry Law
”Section IVSection V, Willingness to Pay Fees. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 1:55 pm
The article traces the impact of the judgment of the Court of Justice in Case C-212/97 Centros Ltd v. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 3:52 am
Discontinuing General Municipal Law Section 207-c benefitsDacey v Dutchess County, 121 AD2d 536 An individual is receiving benefits pursuant to Section 207-a or Section 207-c of the General Municipal Law and is absent on disability leave. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 7:00 am by GSU Law Student
By: Zach Dalton   C-Span is starting a new series for the fall season entitled 12 Historic Supreme Court Decisions. [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 2:04 am
Allianz SpA and another v West Tankers Inc (Case C-185/07); [2009] WLR (D) 44 “It was incompatible with Regulation 44/2001 for a court of an EC member state to make an order to restrain a person from commencing or continuing proceedings before the courts of another member state on the ground that such proceedings would be [...] [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 6:50 am by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
Sleepy’s, LLC, 220 N.J. 289 (2015), a New Jersey appellate panel held, in Garden State Fireworks, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 3:26 am
Establishing a right to General Municipal Law Section 207-c benefitsWhite v County of Cortland, 283 AD2d 826, affirmed, 97 NY2d 336 In the White case the Appellate Division, Third Department, set out a basic principal it follows in determining if an individual is eligible for disability benefits under General Municipal Law Section 207-c as follows: Section 207-c is a remedial statute and thus is to be liberally construed in favor of the claimant. [read post]