Search for: "CERTAIN ECONOMIC LOSS PLAINTIFFS"
Results 401 - 420
of 1,248
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Aug 2020, 3:26 pm
Having observed and commented on the D&O insurance industry for many years, I am accustomed to periodic proclamations from non-industry-based observers about how the D&O insurance industry ought to work, based on various social, behavioral, or economic notions. [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 9:05 am
Opportunity for profit or loss Likewise, Mr. [read post]
10 Dec 2006, 5:10 pm
A party may demonstrate irreparable harm by showing that economic loss would result in an immediate significant loss in a business that exceeds mere diminution in profits. [read post]
19 Mar 2023, 3:41 pm
I’m sure economic experts could provide other reasons why the value of the company decreased by about $82 billion afterwards. [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 7:53 am
A challenge to a state law mandating the payment of union fees by certain public employees met with an unusual, if not unexpected, end in March. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 5:47 pm
A contract is a bargained-for exchange that may entitle you to certain benefits, like money, products, or services. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 4:44 pm
Family members may be able to recover damages for loss of care, guidance and companionship and certain pecuniary losses. [read post]
11 Feb 2018, 2:35 pm
On February 8, 2018, a plaintiff shareholder filed a securities class action lawsuit against Bill Barrett Corporation and certain of its directors and officers. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 2:42 am
As reflected in its Amended Complaint in the Alameda case (here), the plaintiff alleges that earlier in this decade with the City of Alameda issued certain municipal revenue anticipation notes, it knew the funding mechanism was never going to achieve the results needed, because the funding mechanism "was not economically feasible" for multiple reasons, "all of which were known to the City. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 6:00 am
Image via Wikipedia Here at Construction Law Musings I have discussed the interaction of the so called “economic loss rule,” construction contracts and tort claims on numerous occasions. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 12:20 pm
Tort Cost Trends", Towers Watson also translated annual tort costs into the following cost categories (with 2001 percentages): 1) administrative costs - 21%; 2) defense costs - 14%; 3) plaintiff attorneys -19%; 4) economic loss - 22%; and 5) non-economic loss - 24%. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 10:36 am
These duties can include keeping the premises safe for customers or visitors within certain locations. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 5:34 am
” Consumers just don’t like being charged extra, because of loss aversion. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 7:33 am
The Board observed that “economic prejudice to the defendant may ensue whether or not the plaintiff overtly lulled the defendant into believing that the plaintiff would not act, or whether or not the defendant believed that the plaintiff would have grounds for action. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 4:00 am
The suit would normally proceed in the usual fashion, with the parties conducting “discovery” with each other, using motions and other filing to attempt to gain certain tactical advantages and, if all else failed, preparing for trial. [read post]
28 Jul 2013, 8:57 am
However, as many FLSA practitioners are no doubt aware, certain industries seem to have more than their fair share of employers who misclassify their employees as independent contractors. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 8:46 am
Lamken said “absolutely, without having to show any loss. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 7:14 pm
In addition, a journalist or whistleblower convicted under the law could be forced to pay publication damages of twice the “economic loss” a business suffered as a result of the exposé. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 9:30 am
Where the plaintiff succeeds in proving a violation of section 1102.5(b), compensatory damages are recoverable, including economic damages for past and future wage loss as well as emotional distress damages. [read post]
29 Dec 2019, 12:07 pm
The Plaintiffs and the Class Members were adversely affected by the enactment of Chapter 546 and suffered a pure economic loss, but it is plain and obvious that they do not have a cause of action for negligence. [read post]
