Search for: "CLARENCE LITTLE"
Results 401 - 420
of 1,414
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 May 2020, 12:32 pm
Vance and Little Sisters of the Poor v. [read post]
28 May 2020, 9:05 pm
Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro has reportedly dismissed the coronavirus as a “little flu” and repeatedly declined to impose a national lockdown to contain the virus’s spread. [read post]
22 May 2020, 1:51 pm
The biggest difference in a case was in Little Sisters of the Poor v. [read post]
19 May 2020, 1:52 pm
This week, there was very little movement. [read post]
19 May 2020, 10:11 am
Most signs point to a favorable evolution, as there was plenty of engagement, including from Justice Clarence Thomas, who has seldom spoken in the past. [read post]
15 May 2020, 10:11 am
Question: In 2017, Justice Clarence Thomas wrote in his concurrence in Ziglar v. [read post]
12 May 2020, 4:05 am
Booking.com, which asks whether the addition of “.com” to a generic term creates a protectable trademark, and Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home v. [read post]
8 May 2020, 3:43 am
” At National Review, Andrea Picciotti-Bayer writes that “Wednesday’s oral argument in the Supreme Court” in Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home v. [read post]
7 May 2020, 1:24 pm
Apparently, little is at stake for Sineneng-Smith herself; her convictions of several related mail-fraud offenses had been affirmed, so she will have a record in any event, and she is now out of custody. [read post]
6 May 2020, 11:43 am
Justice Clarence Thomas, on the other hand, clearly seemed to be a vote to uphold the exemptions. [read post]
5 May 2020, 4:54 pm
If you have a little down time, now is a great time to expand your knowledge of the Supreme Court and participate in a little bit of history. [read post]
5 May 2020, 4:54 pm
If you have a little down time, now is a great time to expand your knowledge of the Supreme Court and participate in a little bit of history. [read post]
5 May 2020, 4:54 pm
If you have a little down time, now is a great time to expand your knowledge of the Supreme Court and participate in a little bit of history. [read post]
5 May 2020, 10:27 am
After a little over an hour of argument by telephone, it seemed that the answer will probably still be yes, although the vote may be closer than it was seven years ago. [read post]
5 May 2020, 3:54 am
At Slate, David Gans argues that “[t]he sweeping arguments for a total religious exemption” in Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home v. [read post]
4 May 2020, 3:17 am
Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas dissented; Justice Elena Kagan was recused. [read post]
1 May 2020, 7:00 am
His dissent was joined by Justice Clarence Thomas and by Chief Justice John Roberts. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 9:01 pm
” This notion, that “constitutional rights necessarily protect the prerequisites for their exercise” (I’m borrowing Justice Clarence Thomas’s phrase), echoes that recently used to support a right to access shooting ranges as necessary to bolster the core right to bear arms in self-defense.After addressing the dissent’s objections to embracing a positive right (discussed more fully below), the court emphasized that “the right defined in this opinion… [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 3:15 pm
With only 60 minutes in a normal argument and eight justices who are generally active questioners (Justice Clarence Thomas rarely asks questions), there is rarely a moment of dead air at the Supreme Court. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 9:11 am
The majority seems focused on the little skirmish and the practical considerations about how to “weed out bad patent claims efficiently. [read post]
