Search for: "CLEMENTS v. THE STATE"
Results 401 - 420
of 725
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Oct 2024, 2:16 pm
Glossip contends that prosecutors violated not only Brady but also the court’s 1959 decision in Napue v. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 6:24 am
United States, a sentencing case that was argued on Monday. [read post]
1 Apr 2022, 8:49 am
ShareWednesday’s argument in Viking River Cruises v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 1:56 am
United States, 10-cv-8435. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 12:23 pm
The case is Bond v. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 3:45 am
In State v. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 5:59 am
Supreme Court Insider: Our Supreme Court newsletter on Wednesday featured: an interview with Montana’s attorney general on the case from his state that could get the Court to reconsider Citizens United; a report on Paul Clement’s not-great day arguing before the Court; and a profile of Drinker Biddle’s Lawrence Fox, who got the Court’s attention with a powerful legal ethics brief in Maples v. [read post]
24 Nov 2009, 4:42 pm
- Hartford lawyer Daniel Schwartz of Pullman & Comley in his Connecticut Employment Law Blog Holding the Government to Its Promises: United States v. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 9:17 am
Inc. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 4:49 am
Solicitor General Paul Clement, who will be arguing on behalf of the NRA.Stay tuned for the decision on this one as it will affect how states can regulate our right to bear arms.info@clarkstonlegal.comwww.clarkstonlegal.com [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 7:02 am
Panelists are Paul Clement, counsel to the plaintiff States and, Michael Carvin, counsel to plaintiff National Federation of Independent Business. [read post]
14 Feb 2008, 2:00 pm
The new appeal is Gates v. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 7:51 am
The request, the NRA noted in its motion, is opposed by the lead parties in McDonald, et al., v. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 5:26 pm
That case is California Common Cause v. [read post]
25 Sep 2023, 9:02 pm
Like in Bantam Books v. [read post]
29 Aug 2019, 8:48 am
In one well-known example, DeFunis v. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 12:00 pm
United States, and Florida v. [read post]
16 May 2023, 8:21 am
For example, in the securities law context, a Second Circuit panel upheld the SEC’s Regulation Best Interest, but only after finding that a private plaintiff—not the state plaintiffs—had Article III standing (See, XY Planning Network, LLC v. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 8:06 am
Clement and Theodore B. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 12:10 pm
These are Department for Education v Information Commissioner & Whitmey [2018] UKUT 348 and Cabinet Office v Information Commissioner & Webber [2018] UKUT 410. [read post]
