Search for: "CONFIDENTIAL INFORMANT v. US " Results 401 - 420 of 7,770
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Dec 2012, 2:16 pm by Paul E. Freehling
By addressing both the nature of the information at issue and the conduct related to alleged unlawful acquisition or use of such information, Judge Koh very broadly interpreted the preemptive effect of CUTSA. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 4:44 pm by INFORRM
Facts In 2006, the Swiss police informed the Slovenian law-enforcement authorities about a dynamic IP address that was being used in a peer-to-peer file-sharing network and was linked to the sharing of child sexual abused material. [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 6:55 am
The Krauses argue that because they did not further disseminate the confidential information they accessed or use it to extort their victims, their crimes are not representative of the most serious of their kind. [read post]
9 Jun 2013, 9:34 pm by Michael Atkins
DebtorWise moved to disqualify the lawyer, arguing that he had learned confidential information about DebtorWise in the course of his representations that he should not be able to use to its detriment, including information about its “business plan, account volume, and litigation strategy. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 12:14 pm by Ryan Mulvey
The Argus Leader case concerns the construction and application of Exemption 4, which covers trade secrets and privilege or confidential commercial or financial information. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 2:46 pm by Kenneth J. Vanko
(No doubt, there are others that are more nuanced, but we'll leave it at that for today.)Courts in several circuits - the Seventh included - have taken a broad interpretation of the CFAA's terms, reasoning that once an employee violates a duty of loyalty, his use and access of a protected computer to obtain confidential information must exceed what has been authorized. [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 9:01 am by Kristen Prinz
Many companies use employment agreements to protect confidential information and/or to prevent executives from working for a competitor or soliciting employees or customers after leaving the company's employ, regardless of who initiated the termination. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 7:10 am by John Jascob
According to FSOC, disclosure of documents provided by state insurance regulators is precluded by the confidentiality protections of Dodd-Frank Act coupled with state law privileges (MetLife, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 2:11 pm by Jason Krause
Samsung litigation, confidential documents wound up in the hands of Samsung employees, who used the information in business negotiations. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 7:14 am by Kara M. Maciel
Prior to resigning, employee uses his company computer to access confidential and proprietary information and then sends the information to his personal e-mail account to use for the benefit of his new employer. [read post]