Search for: "COST v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION" Results 401 - 420 of 1,011
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Sep 2010, 10:00 pm by froomkin@law.tm
Ten Reasons Why You Should Teach Here — And Three Why You Shouldn't (v. 4.0) 1. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 1:30 pm by Craig Hoffman
  A pilot sued the Privacy Act and is seeking seeking emotional distress damages after the Social Security Administration disclosed to the FAA that the pilot was HIV positive. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 2:57 pm by Erik J. Heels
  Besides IP law, I'm good at spotting trends, connecting people on social networks, fixing things, boiling eggs, and a handful of other things. [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 4:03 pm by Jon L. Gelman
 Likewise, the Social Security System can seek an offset in most jurisdictions for disability insurance payments to injured workers. [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 11:11 am by Karen Denvir
In accordance with the Uhms’ election to receive benefits under Part D, the Social Security Administration withheld monthly premiums from their social security benefits. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 9:50 am by P.J. Blount
– Homeland Security Watch Lawmakers Take Closer Look at DHS’ Social Media Monitoring – Communia Anonymous Promises Regularly Scheduled Friday Attacks – Threat Level The Regulatory Provisions of the Cybersecurity Act of 2012 – Lawfare [read post]
20 Feb 2020, 7:07 am by Stewart Baker
Many believe that the security value of unbreakable encryption outweighs the cost to crime victims and law enforcement. [read post]
10 Apr 2022, 4:56 pm by INFORRM
The Michael Geist blog criticises this change for creating “significant costs with limited to no benefits. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 11:20 am
Sanctions ordered after lawsuit filed pursuant to the Freedom of Information Law ruled frivolousMatter of Fenstermaker v Edgemont Union Free School Dist., 2006 NY Slip Op 52652(U), Decided on September 26, 2006, Supreme Court, Westchester County, Loehr, J. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 12:11 pm by INFORRM
Dingemans LJ set out five factors which together in his view meant that the continuation of the proceedings would bring the administration of justice into disrepute and that they were not worth the candle of pursuing. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 12:25 am by INFORRM
On 18 November 2015, the Administrative Court gave judgment in the case of HM Attorney-General v Conde Nast ([2015] EWHC 3322 (Admin)). [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 10:04 am by bradhendrickslawfirm
He said that his income consisted of Social Security retirement benefits, plus dividends from approximately $450,000 in investments. [read post]