Search for: "California v. Arizona"
Results 401 - 420
of 2,113
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Apr 2020, 9:01 pm
In Janus, Justice Kagan’s dissent for herself and three others, quoting from the 1984 Arizona v. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 1:27 pm
For example, the court mentions Chavez v. [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 4:00 am
Con independencia de la necesaria aclaración sobre el alcance de la frase expuesta, en este análisis acerca de la posible práctica ilegal de la profesión por nuestros abogados y abogadas en una jurisdicción a la cual no están admitidos por vía de una página web será preciso en cualquier caso constatar, como parte de los elementos constitutivos de esta cuestión, si en efecto estos y estas están ejerciendo lo que… [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 3:41 pm
Section 1135 Waiver Issues and COVID-19 (March 25, 2020): On January 31, 2020, Secretary Alex Azar, of the US Department of Health & Human Services (HHS), used his authority under the Public Health Service Act to declare a public health emergency in the United States.[1] Secretary Azar determined that a public health emergency had existed nationwide since January 27, 2020. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 10:41 am
Priscilla Daydee Valdez put an acquaintance in Mexico in touch with someone she knew in Tucson, Arizona, to buy ammunition. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 10:38 am
Co. of California, 699 P.2d 376, 383 (1984). [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 6:22 am
Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit egregiously failed to apply clearly established federal law as determined by the Supreme Court in Arizona v. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 3:50 am
” At Bloomberg, Greg Stohr reports that “[t]he justices, over a dissent by Justice Sonia Sotomayor, blocked a federal appeals court decision that would have let future asylum seekers stay in the U.S. temporarily while their applications are being processed[; t]he appeals court ruling, which would have applied to new applicants in California and Arizona, was set to take effect Thursday. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 1:52 pm
On March 4, 2020, the Court issued a revised Order, reaffirming its earlier decision, but restricting its application to only the border areas contained within the Ninth Circuit (California and Arizona.) [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 1:52 pm
On March 4, 2020, the Court issued a revised Order, reaffirming its earlier decision, but restricting its application to only the border areas contained within the Ninth Circuit (California and Arizona.) [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 4:03 am
” John Kruzel reports at The Hill that “[t]he request comes after a lower court deemed the ‘Remain in Mexico’ policy illegal and ordered a suspension that was scheduled to take effect March 12” in California and Arizona. [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 9:40 am
McBride v. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 11:34 am
District Court for the Southern District of California offered a well-reasoned reality check in Carpenter v. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 12:10 pm
In so doing, Florida joins a growing number of states — including Arizona, California, New Mexico, Oregon, Utah and Washington — that are studying changes in lawyer regulation with the goal of enhancing access to justice. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 4:32 pm
[v] Iowa Code § 91D.1(2). [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 6:55 am
In Arizona v. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 8:59 pm
The Second Circuit ruling in New York v. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 4:02 am
For Capitol Media Services (via Tucson.com), Howard Fischer reports that the court “spurned a bid by Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich to sue California over how it applies its business tax on residents and investors here. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 12:33 pm
The justices turned down Arizona’s request to be able to file an original action – that is a complaint in the Supreme Court – against California, challenging the constitutionality of California’s application of a tax to Arizona limited-liability corporations that invest in California corporations. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 6:32 am
California, No. 150, Orig. [read post]
