Search for: "California v. EPA"
Results 401 - 420
of 683
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2014, 8:36 am
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> Organized Village of Kake v. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 3:28 am
California. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 8:27 am
On American Chemistry Council v. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 5:34 am
Briefly: In an op-ed for The Washington Post, Richard Hasen looks ahead to the anticipated decision in McCutcheon v. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 5:34 pm
In California Motor Transport Co. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 8:06 am
EPA, the U.S. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 3:45 pm
EPA (air quality standards)Alto v. [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 9:08 am
The case, Alt v. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 3:40 pm
In Center for Biological Diversity v. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 3:52 am
At the Constitutional Accountability Center’s Text and History blog, Tom Donnelly provides six reasons to “keep an eye on” next week’s oral arguments in EPA v. [read post]
27 Oct 2013, 9:05 pm
EPA [Jonathan Adler, Richard Faulk] Ilya Somin briefly reviews three new books on constitutional law: John McGinnis and Michael Rappaport on originalism, Randall Kennedy on affirmative action, and Clark Neily on judicial engagement [Volokh] General jurisdiction: “Justices Wrestle With Whether California Law Reaches A Mercedes Plant In Argentina” [Daniel Fisher] Home Building & Loan Ass’n v. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 2:50 pm
(Brown v. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 4:46 am
And the Court also announced that it will not review the latest chapter in the battle over California’s prison crowding. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 6:35 am
(Brown v. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 10:03 pm
The largest data set, however, is from a California fresh-cut processor whom I interviewed as part of writing a comment on the Rule. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 1:26 pm
v. [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 8:53 am
In Lavine v. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 9:58 am
Court of Appeal for the Ninth Circuit held in California Sportfishing Protection Alliance v. [read post]
23 Jul 2013, 1:24 pm
On another bar claim by Defendants, the Appeals Court rules, "Because California has commenced no administrative penalty proceeding that is comparable to a proceeding by the EPA under § 1319(g), the statutory bar of § 1319(g)(6)(A)(ii) does not apply to Plaintiff's claims." [read post]
