Search for: "California v. Marks"
Results 401 - 420
of 4,361
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Aug 2009, 11:44 am
On August 5, the U.S. attorney's office for Northern California filed a brief informing the court that the federal government may seek to intervene in the matter, as it previously did in the Stauffer v. [read post]
30 Oct 2014, 9:21 pm
Drake Law School Professor Mark Kende has put up another post in our continuing exchange over the question of whether Justice Thomas supports the Supreme Court’s notorious decision in Korematsu v. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 10:56 am
People who file lawsuits need to be aware of the discovery rules as shown by Du-All Safety, LLC v. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 4:01 am
Bad Boys Bail Bonds, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 8:51 pm
In Wyatt Technology Corporation v. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 3:41 am
Flame & Wax, Inc. v. [read post]
26 May 2009, 4:09 pm
Attorneys for Sylvester Stallone and another named cross-defendant recently filed a petition for review with the California Supreme Court challenging a significant published California Court of Appeal decision (Brescia v. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 11:04 am
The Ninth Circuit held that this was incorrect in light of the California Supreme Court's decision in Marks v. [read post]
31 May 2011, 2:13 pm
The California Vehicle Code permits persons with disabled placards or license plates to park an unlimited time in zones that are marked with a sign that says you can only park there for a limited time. [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 6:41 pm
” The case cite is California Board Sports, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 9:55 am
Case citation: Court of Master Sommeliers v. [read post]
21 Oct 2008, 11:00 am
Corporacion Habanos, S.A. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 3:07 pm
” In re Tobacco II Cases, 46 Cal.4th at 327 (internal quotation marks omitted); see also Clemens v. [read post]
14 Sep 2021, 10:20 am
Mark similarity. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 4:11 am
Sunkist Growers, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 4:19 am
In The Economist, Steven Mazie continues his two-part series on the case with a look at the arguments by the union and California; other commentary comes from Robert Alt, who continues his series on the case, and Mark Pulliam at National Review’s Bench Memos. [read post]
25 Jun 2021, 3:34 pm
Ultimately, California v. [read post]
15 Jun 2024, 8:02 am
Garland v. [read post]
15 Jun 2024, 8:02 am
Garland v. [read post]
15 Jun 2024, 8:02 am
Garland v. [read post]
