Search for: "California v. Rodriguez"
Results 401 - 420
of 434
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Sep 2008, 8:29 pm
Cruz-Rodriguez, No. 052492, 052493 Convictions and sentences of twenty-six defendants for crimes arising from their involvement in a large drug distribution network that operated in a Puerto Rico housing project are affirmed over claims of error that: 1) the evidence was insufficient; 2) the evidence failed to implicate one defendant in any conspiracy; 3) the evidence implicated a defendant in a conspiracy different from the one charged; and 4) district court committed a host of errors,… [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 2:25 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, September 04, 2008 US v. [read post]
30 Aug 2008, 3:19 pm
Rodriguez-Rodriguez, 393 F.3d 849, 852-53 (9th Cir. 2005) (discussing Cal. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 4:57 pm
Rodriguez, 76 Cal.Rptr.3d 1 (Cal. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 3:24 am
However, few teams will change in strength too much from last year.College FootballGame MatchupsAugust 23 to September 1,2008 (visitor v. home)Game below played on August 30 unless otherwise stated. [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 5:22 pm
Jimenez-Nava (5th Cir. 2001) 243 F.3d 192, 195, & fn. 3; Rodriguez v. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 2:36 pm
Rodriguez, No. 06-2656 Sentencing courts have discretion to consider items such as fast-track disparity in considering requests for variant sentences premised on disagreements with the manner in which the sentencing guidelines operate, however, they are not obligated to deviate from the guidelines based on those items. [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 4:08 am
Rodriguez-Rodriguez, 393 F.3d at 857. [read post]
27 Apr 2008, 2:38 pm
Ronald "Shorty" Rodriguez, before the Hon. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 11:34 am
Rodriguez-Amaya, No. 06-4514 Conviction for unlawful reentry after deportation by an aggravated felon is affirmed where the time defendant was detained by United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement on administrative charges pending his removal was not detention "in connection with" his arrest, thus defendant's indictment did not violate the Speedy Trial Act. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 9:47 am
Inc. v. [read post]
7 Apr 2008, 3:00 pm
SC04-49) and suspended Rodriguez for two years plus a fine (Florida Bar v. [read post]
16 Mar 2008, 7:38 am
Rodriguez, 133 Cal.App.4th 545, 554 (Cal.App. 2005)). [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 9:04 pm
As soon as I glanced at United States v. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 6:00 am
(Equilon Enterprises v. [read post]
18 Feb 2008, 6:14 pm
American National Can Co. (2000) 84 Cal.App.4th 112, 118; Rodriguez v. [read post]
1 Jan 2008, 4:08 am
California 413 U.S. 15 (1973)(developing three part test for obscenity)Roe v. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 1:37 am
"
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, October 23, 2007US v. [read post]
27 Oct 2007, 10:47 am
Co., Ltd. v. [read post]
