Search for: "Case v. People" Results 401 - 420 of 51,835
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Nov 2020, 10:42 am by Gerard N. Magliocca
The principal case upon which the Government relies, Franklin v. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 9:34 am
As Florida personal injury attorneys, we understand that people who are injured in an auto accident want their cases resolved as quickly and effectively as possible. [read post]
26 Jul 2019, 9:03 am by JESSICA JONES, MATRIX CHAMBERS
The question for the court in this case is what exactly that phrase means, and who will therefore fall within the category of people capable of committing the crime. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 5:18 am by Jim Gerl
You may have noticed my blog posts last week on the odd way we name special ed cases and why people hate lawyers. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 3:42 pm
Richard Leon is a bad, bad guy who robs and shoots people for utterly no reason. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 1:52 pm
  This substantively matters, because the safety valve for the latter category is somewhat smaller than the rules that apply to the former.The Court of Appeal decides that the more limited safety valve applies to people whose sentences were not yet final. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 2:23 pm
  The next time you wonder whether some judges don't put a "thumb on the scale" even in high-profile criminal cases, remember this one.P.S. - The majority opinion's worth a read as well. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 9:31 am
Frierson (1991) 53 Cal.3d 730, 740, 742), as may one made four days before trial is to begin (People v. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 4:17 pm by Stephen Bilkis
People v Murphy Court Discusses Whether the Sentence Imposed was Excessive in Driving While Intoxicated Offenses The defendant was convicted of aggravated driving while intoxicated in violation of Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1192 (2-a) (b), driving while intoxicated in violation of Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1192 (2), and driving while intoxicated in violation of Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1192 (3). [read post]
18 Jul 2013, 1:21 pm
This is in accordance with the court’s rulings in the cases of People v. [read post]