Search for: "Case v. Shepherd"
Results 401 - 420
of 558
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jan 2011, 8:50 am
FIA Card:I like how Judge Ramirez thinks:The Florida Supreme Court in Wilson v. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 3:20 am
It seems so … Commission report to Parliament on IPR enforcement (PatLit) Several EU members push for unified patent system (Patent Docs) The Princess and the Personal Name: a reader comments – Case C 208/09 Ilonka Sayn-Wittgenstein v Landeshauptmann von Wien (IPKat) General Court – More on the ‘Lindt bunny (reindeer, ribbon and Storck mouse) shape’ cases (IPKat) Chocolates and product shape marks – Benelux, French and German… [read post]
1 Jan 2011, 6:44 am
The videos involved in the US v. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 5:51 pm
Now, an investor only has to prove gross negligence to win the case. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 8:37 am
“AutoZone contends that even if Shepherd’s condition [...] [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 12:05 pm
Ass'n v. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 9:29 pm
The reasoning, thanks to Justice Blackmun's obiter dictum in Jones v. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 5:44 am
” – from Kris Dunn, The HR Capitalist Trade Secrets and Competition Noncompete cases not slowed by economy, legislation – from Jay Shepherd’s Gruntled Employees Trade Secret Statistics – from Fair Competition Law Roy’s Analysis of Quirky Question # 164; Who Owns Employees’ Ideas? [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 1:36 pm
The jury awarded $500,000 against the hospital in Estate of Hackl v. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 6:01 am
In John v MGN Ltd [1997] QB 586, [1995] EWCA Civ 23 (12 December 1995) Lord Bingham MR said that such juries “were in the position of sheep loosed on an unfenced common, with no shepherd”. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 3:14 pm
Covenant Trust Co. v. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 4:21 am
Lee v. [read post]
31 Oct 2010, 6:02 pm
In Lockamy v. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 9:16 am
Pineda v. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 9:15 am
Lewis v. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 4:11 pm
(referring to Kahn v. [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 10:36 pm
The previous posts are the Introduction, Part I,Part II, Part III, Part IV and Part V.] [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 6:14 pm
SHEPHERD and SALTER, JJ., and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge, concur. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 1:28 pm
He held that maladministration can be a relevant factor in an oppression case, following Southwark LBC v Sarfo (1999) 32 HLR 602 CA, Jephson Homes Housing Association v Moisejevs (2001) 33 HLR 594 CA and Southwark LBC v Augusta Legal Action 20 February 2007). [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 1:28 pm
He held that maladministration can be a relevant factor in an oppression case, following Southwark LBC v Sarfo (1999) 32 HLR 602 CA, Jephson Homes Housing Association v Moisejevs (2001) 33 HLR 594 CA and Southwark LBC v Augusta Legal Action 20 February 2007). [read post]
