Search for: "Chambers v State" Results 401 - 420 of 5,337
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Feb 2023, 7:13 am by Jeff Welty
The Associated Press reports here on the aftermath of Ramirez v. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
For example, some state officials banned the consideration of social or political interests when making investment decisions for state pension funds or have redirected state funds away from large asset managers because these officials claim the companies are prioritising political and social agendas over duties to clients. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 3:29 pm by Reference Staff
Washington State Commercial Passenger Fishing Vessel Association, 443 U.S. 658 (1979) and Washington v. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 6:18 am by Jennifer Trahan
  Subsequently, in the Decision on Immunity from Jurisdiction, Prosecutor v. [read post]
5 Feb 2023, 1:20 am by Frank Cranmer
The ECtHR Grand Chamber judgment in Fedotova v Russia on the legal recognition of same-sex couples. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 5:30 am by Katie Gu
The State Legislature can refer constitutional amendments to the ballot by a two-thirds supermajority vote in each chamber. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 1:32 am by Frank Cranmer
Background In Fedotova and Others v Russia [2023] ECHR 55, the six applicants formed three same-sex couples: two female and one male. [read post]
28 Jan 2023, 4:00 pm
              In 1984, the United States Supreme Court decided a case called Graham v. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 7:45 pm by Jim Sedor
Supreme Court said it cannot identify the person who in the spring leaked a draft of the opinion that overturned Roe v. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 5:59 am by Menachem Z. Rosensaft
These are the folks who would want to roll back segregation, for whom Loving v. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 5:57 am by Mukarrum Ahmed
These cases demonstrate clearly the change of position as compared with Allianz v West Tankers and Turner v Grovit, respectively. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 4:48 am by Peter Mahler
” Examples featured on this blog include the decision by Justice Saliann Scarpulla (then a Manhattan Commercial Division judge, later elevated to the appellate bench) in Advanced 23, LLC v Chamber House Partners, LLC and retired Justice Charles Ramos’s decision in Goldstein v Pikus. [read post]