Search for: "Child v. Social Security Administration"
Results 401 - 420
of 544
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Dec 2011, 5:16 am
Barber v. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 11:05 pm
Accordingly, the slight differences in actions and words of Obama v. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 3:11 am
KF 547 F84 2012 Evaluation for child custody / Geri S.W. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 9:56 am
So long as the bank account is in their name and uses one of their social security numbers, it won’t create a problem with my government benefits. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 6:21 am
Capato, in which Court will consider whether a child conceived after the death of a biological parent is eligible for Social Security benefits as a child survivor. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 11:14 am
Taking the case on to the Supreme Court, the Social Security administrator, Michael J. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 9:12 pm
Dukes, and Turner v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 11:53 am
Justice Eakin’s most memorable dissent I’m aware of was in Porreco v. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 4:05 pm
Even Social Security payments, which are exempt from most garnishments, can be attached for child support payments. (2) While the Social Security Administration (SSA) is bound to comply with state-ordered child support payments, it is immune from suits for damages resulting from its failure to follow such orders. (3) This immunity was upheld recently by a New Jersey appeals court in the case of Jacobson v. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 9:16 pm
A primary author of the Bolivian Social Security pension privatization law, Ms. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 4:40 am
Steven was receiving disability benefit from the Social Security Administration (SSA) and the NJ office of child support ( the NJ state agency which is in charge of collecting child support) sent a garnishment order to the SSA. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 10:03 am
The United States enjoys sovereign immunity from liability for damages resulting from the Social Security Administration's failure to withhold disability benefit payments, even though the child support garnishment order was validly entered. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 3:33 am
"As a general matter, the Guidelines specify sources of income as follows: a. compensation for services, including wages, fees, tips, and commissions; b. the operation of a business minus ordinary and necessary operating expenses (see IRS Schedule C); c. gains derived from dealings in property; d. interest and dividends (see IRS Schedule B); e. rents (minus ordinary and necessary expenses - see IRS Schedule E); f. bonuses and royalties; g. alimony and separate maintenance payments… [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 9:04 am
What is the 5 step process the Social Security Administration uses in determining eligibility for Social Security Disability Income Benefits (SSDI)? [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 3:58 am
Decisions of interest involving Government and Administrative Law Source: Justia September 23, 2011 Gonzalez-Droz v. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 8:26 am
” Plessy v. [read post]
4 Sep 2011, 7:15 am
At issue was whether a child conceived through artificial insemination more than a year after her father's death qualified for benefits under the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 402, 416. [read post]
4 Sep 2011, 7:15 am
At issue was whether a child conceived through artificial insemination more than a year after her father's death qualified for benefits under the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 402, 416. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 5:10 pm
The broadcast repeatedly referenced the sexual abuse of a child in the context of a daycare, potentially creating the impression that a daycare worker abused a child”. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 9:14 am
The Social Security Administration (SSA) has taken the view that posthumously conceived children can qualify as “children” only through the state law intestacy provision in 42 USC §416(h)(2)(A). [read post]
