Search for: "Clay v. State"
Results 401 - 420
of 620
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Sep 2011, 5:33 pm
EEOC v. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 7:15 am
In last week’s case (Singh v. [read post]
11 Sep 2011, 1:30 pm
Indeed, at the very minimum, he would be required, under the rule in Wilson v. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 9:41 am
(See, for example: Eysoldt v. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 1:40 pm
The Supreme Court has granted certiorari in Perry v. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 2:21 pm
Judge Clay also scolded the majority for its “rubber stamping” of the facts as viewed by the state courts. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 9:50 am
Va. 2009) and Vitatoe v. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 2:58 am
When the plaintiffs first approached Ainsworth in 1976 with a view to him producing some uniforms for use in the film, he was given some drawings and a clay model. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 4:30 am
Smilowitz v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 12:56 pm
The 6th Circuit opinion in Matthews v. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 4:23 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 7:55 am
" Delgado v. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 5:07 am
The more recent decision in Innovention Toys v MGA Entertainment (Fed Cir., Mar 21 2011) though perhaps less factually clear-cut also ruled that the art there cited was analogous. [read post]
26 May 2011, 3:11 pm
[Post by Venkat Balasubramani] Simonoff v. [read post]
26 May 2011, 10:08 am
” Ward v. [read post]
16 May 2011, 7:37 am
Ross Decisions in Buchek v. [read post]
11 May 2011, 6:28 am
As Dan Ikenson and I wrote a few months ago: [V]oluntary economic exchange is inherently fair, benefits both parties, and allocates scarce resources more efficiently than a system under which government dictates or limits choices. [read post]
6 May 2011, 2:27 pm
In doing some browsing I came across a copy of the Article 32, UCMJ, IO report in United States v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 6:00 am
The State filed criminal charges against Ronnie Moore and Jeff Moore in the Clay County Justice Court for their involvement with the internet café. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 4:00 am
Here is the Court's decision in Penny Pinchers v. [read post]
