Search for: "Clements v. State"
Results 401 - 420
of 808
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jun 2013, 2:00 am
In Clement v. [read post]
10 May 2013, 1:35 pm
Question: In what basic way does your book differ from that of Jan Crawford’s Supreme Conflict: The Inside Story of the Struggle for Control of the United States Supreme Court (2008) and Jeffrey Toobin’s The Nine: Inside the Secret World of the Supreme Court (2008)? [read post]
8 May 2013, 9:01 am
At oral argument in NFIB v. [read post]
3 May 2013, 12:57 pm
Fisher v. [read post]
28 Apr 2013, 1:42 pm
Clements, 2013 U.S. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 8:28 am
Clement. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 5:52 pm
This morning the Supreme Court granted cert in DaimlerChrysler AG v Bauman, an ATS suit against Daimler. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 7:01 pm
Under the state court's interpretation, said [Paul Clement, representing the guardian ad litem appointed by the state court to determine the child's best interest], ICWA moves the inquiry away from the child's best interests to focus instead on biology, the birth father and race — namely, that the child has 1 percent Indian blood. 1%! [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 6:18 am
Your Curmudgeon is currently in Quincy, Illinois, working with co-counsel to prepare for the upcoming trial, which starts next week, in the case of The Diocese of Quincy, et al. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 3:26 pm
[Citation to Romer v. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 2:48 pm
Here's the audio and transcript for today's oral argument in United States v. [read post]
24 Mar 2013, 7:47 pm
… There’s no connection to the United States whatsoever. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 7:36 pm
In a recent unpublished opinion, Charles Virzi Construction, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 6:38 pm
Supreme Court’s ruling in Concepcion v. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 1:39 pm
— United States v. [read post]
10 Mar 2013, 10:04 pm
The case is styled as American Express v. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 7:15 am
Again at the Volokh Conspiracy, Nick Rosencranz responds to arguments in the amicus brief filed by Dale Carpenter and others in United States v. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 6:16 am
To prove an antitrust claim, Justice Kagan stated, one needs economic evidence of monopoly power, antitrust injury and damages. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 5:49 am
Last week, Judge Jackson Kiser of the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia issued an opinion and order in Clement v. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 6:52 am
American Express Company v. [read post]
