Search for: "Cohen v. California" Results 401 - 420 of 809
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Sep 2023, 5:29 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In his opposition affidavit, David states that he has no recollection of receiving it, and Singer’s claim that the letter was mailed does not give rise to the presumption of receipt, as he does not present evidence of defendant firm’s office practices pertinent to mailing (see Lindsay v Pasternack Tilker Ziegler Walsh Stanton & Romano LLP, 129 AD3d 790, 793 [2d Dept 2015]; Morrison Cohen Singer & Weinstein, LLP v Brophy, 19 AD3d 161, 162 [1 st Dept… [read post]
15 Mar 2015, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
Tani, University of California, Berkeley, has been productive. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 12:34 pm by Matt C. Bailey
[As a side note, the Court's footnote 8 appears to take a position that knocks out a fundamental premise of its sister division’s analysis in Cohen v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 11:55 am by Eugene Volokh
California, which stressed that even vulgarities such as “fuck” are generally constitutionally protected. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 3:42 am by INFORRM
The claimant’s defamation claim was made out in De Kauwe v Cohen (No 4) [2022] WASC35. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 12:24 am by INFORRM
On 16 February 2022, judgement was handed down in De Kaume v Cohen (No 4) [2022] WASC 35. [read post]
11 Nov 2015, 2:03 pm by Mark Tushnet
(I think he made that observation in connection with some arguments around Cohen v. [read post]
24 Feb 2019, 4:16 am by Lev Sugarman
District Court for the Northern District of California alleging that an IRS employee leaked financial records relating to Michael Cohen. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 10:10 am by Sherica Celine
Recent Supreme Court Rulings Impacting Labor & Employment Podcast Listen to attorney Tim Taylor of Holland & Knight discuss the implications of Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. [read post]