Search for: "Cohen v. Williams"
Results 401 - 420
of 499
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jan 2015, 9:01 pm
Davis v. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am
[We're moving this up, because we've received an updated version of the program. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 5:00 am
Examples of such episodes include (1) the President’s conduct toward his former personal lawyer and “fixer” Michael Cohen, and (2) the President’s efforts to prevent public disclosure of a Trump Tower meeting on June 9, 2016 involving Donald Trump Jr., the President’s son-in-law Jared Kushner, campaign chairman Paul Manafort, and at least five other people, including a lawyer connected to the Russian government who promised “dirt” on Hillary… [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 1:09 pm
Citizens, 1919-1924Conveners: Kenneth Mack, Harvard Law School (kmack@law.harvard.edu) Laurie Wood, Florida State University (lmwood@fsu.edu) Jacqueline Briggs, University of Toronto (jacq.briggs@utoronto.ca)John Wertheimer, Davidson College (jowertheimer@davidson.eduLaw and Empire in the Sino-Asian Context (Harvard Law School / TBD)12:00 PM – 4:30 PMLegal History and the Persistent Power of State and Local Governments (Cambridge Room)Moderators: Brooke… [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 9:07 am
On November 14, 2014, in Priests for Life v. [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 9:01 pm
He is a co-author, along with William Cohen and Jonathan Varat, of a major constitutional law casebook, and a co-author of several volumes of the Wright & Mille [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm
Courts can revisit their prior rulings, higher courts can change the legal landscape against which lower courts make decisions (as the Supreme Court in fact did in the immigration regulation setting in 2012 in Arizona v. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 2:00 pm
A Musical Experience + Helmut Lang + Henna by Senya + House of Leifer + J&J Snack Foods Corporation + J and V Audio Inc. + JAKKS Pacific, Inc. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 9:01 pm
In this setting, states and cities argue that the anti-commandeering principle prevents the feds from requiring state and local authorities to affirmatively provide information about or access to individuals who may have committed immigration law violations.Perhaps the most important Supreme Court case on this point is Printz v. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 4:07 am
Network v. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 4:49 am
Ben Protess, William K. [read post]
31 May 2017, 9:01 pm
The answer is yes, and the Supreme Court effectively made that clear two years ago in its important ruling in Arizona Legislature v. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 3:57 am
§ 1920 (PDF) t.co/f6HHAi9a (Latham & Watkins) No Resolution Reached in Pippins v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 3:26 am
Cohen, B. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 9:01 pm
In Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 9:01 pm
SB 1272 submits the following question (designated by the California Secretary of State as Proposition 49) to the California electorate for its input: Shall the Congress of the United States propose, and the California Legislature ratify, an amendment or amendments to the United States Constitution to overturn Citizens United v. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 9:01 pm
This was true in Rumsfeld v. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 12:29 pm
My main adversary Mike Williams did not miss a beat; he jumped to his feet to say no, and that he did not know why I was belaboring this study. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 1:04 pm
Simon.Stahl, Philip Michael.Chicago, Illinois : ABA Section of Family Law, [2013]KF547 .S733 2013 Family Law According to our hearts : Rhinelander v. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 7:49 am
- http://bit.ly/MWxSL5 (iTechPost) Apple v. [read post]
