Search for: "Commonwealth v. Major" Results 401 - 420 of 941
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Dec 2016, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
But a strict count of states would reveal that a substantial number, maybe even a majority, still look at fault.McGrath v. [read post]
27 Dec 2016, 4:11 am
In the Entry Tax case, the Supreme Court cited Cole v Whitfield at length, with the eventual test devised by the majority – prohibiting discriminatory taxes on interstate trade rather than taxes in and of themselves – closely resembling that which resulted from Cole v Whitfield. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 2:11 am by Blog Editorial
James Wolffe QC, now appears in support of the Respondents. 15.16 Lavery QC states that the will of Parliament should not overrule the will of the Irish people and that the triggering of article 50 without their consent would do just that. 15.14 Lavery QC says that Northern Ireland has a complex constitutional settlement that is legally binding as a result of  section 1 of the Northern Ireland Act 1998. 15.10  Lavery QC says that section 1 of the Northern Ireland Act… [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 2:30 am by Blog Editorial
He discusses the application of De Keyser principles and the controls imposed by Parliament on prerogative powers to ratify international treaties. 13.05: The hearing has adjourned for lunch and is expected to resume at 14:00. 12.58:  The next case referred to is R v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs ex parte Rees-Mogg: James Eadie QC submits that the availability of the prerogative in relation to EU law depends on… [read post]
27 Nov 2016, 9:45 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
Senior falls: Dangerous, preventable and leading cause of elder injuries in Mass., November 2, 2016, By Cyrus Moulton, Worcester Telegram More Blog Entries: Alcala v. [read post]
27 Nov 2016, 9:45 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
Senior falls: Dangerous, preventable and leading cause of elder injuries in Mass., November 2, 2016, By Cyrus Moulton, Worcester Telegram More Blog Entries: Alcala v. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 12:23 pm by David Russcol
That is a significant change in the law because the Supreme Judicial Court held in the 2012 case of Commonwealth v. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 12:23 pm by David Russcol
That is a significant change in the law because the Supreme Judicial Court held in the 2012 case of Commonwealth v. [read post]
12 Nov 2016, 3:18 pm
In the Entry Tax case, the Supreme Court cited Cole v Whitfield at length, with the eventual test devised by the majority – prohibiting discriminatory taxes on interstate trade rather than taxes in and of themselves – closely resembling that which resulted from Cole v Whitfield. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 6:31 am by Joy Waltemath
Justice Hughes concurred in the result only, while Justice Wright filed a separate dissenting opinion (Kentucky Restaurant Association v. [read post]