Search for: "Conte v. State" Results 401 - 420 of 550
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jan 2012, 5:39 pm by Elizabeth A. Wilson
Congress intervenes when it wants, as it did after the Supreme Court, in McCarthy v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 9:12 am by Bexis
Weeks, its first appearance in a state high court.We're willing to bet that the defense briefing in Weeks represents the current state of the art in defending/arguing against Conte-style liability. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 10:33 am by Bexis
Western States Medical Center, 535 U.S. 357 (2002).Masoudi & Pruitt, “The Food & Drug Administration v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 1:00 pm by Bexis
March 31, 2011), one of the few courts anywhere not to dismiss a Conte-type non-manufacturer liability claim for failure to state a claim. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 7:00 am by Bexis
Plough, Inc., 863 P.2d 167, 177 (Cal. 1993) (where plaintiff “neither read nor obtained translation of the product labeling . . . there is no conceivable causal connection between the representations or omissions that accompanied the product”) (over-the-counter drug case; plaintiff did not read warning); Conte v. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 2:50 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
" Cannistra v O'Connor, McGuinness, Conte, Doyle, Oleson & Collins, 728 N.Y.S.2d 770 (N.Y. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 3:08 pm
In those cases, there may still be claims against the original drug manufacturer under the so-called Innovator Liability theory, first described in California in Conte v. [read post]