Search for: "Core v. Ohio" Results 401 - 420 of 458
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Feb 2010, 7:53 am by Erin Miller
Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District No. 1 v. [read post]
10 Jan 2010, 10:22 pm
Prestige Realty Group of Ohio & Florida, LLC (In re Prestige Realty Group of Ohio & Florida, LLC), 2009 WL 3817297 (Bankr. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 2:58 am by Michael Scutt
He wrote to John giving some interesting background on the Tiger Woods story and also related how someone in Ohio was convicted of being drunk in charge of a motorised bar stool. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 12:55 pm
Today, the Ohio Supreme Court issued a groundbreaking decision in the case State of Ohio v. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 12:46 pm by Steve Bainbridge
That trend was reversed following the Supreme Court’s decision in CTS Corp. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 4:06 pm by admin
Environmental Protection Agency Region 5 has reached an agreement with J&J Cores LLC on alleged clean-air violations at the company’s secondary aluminum production facility at 2237 Oxford Township Road, Newcomerstown, Ohio. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 5:46 pm
Mich. 1987) ............................................................ 46 Wheeling-Pittsburgh Steel Corp. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 4:36 am
The cases the dissent relies upon, according to Scalia, were primarily decided under the now discarded Ohio v. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 6:41 am
At issue in the case was whether double jeopardy barred Ohio from holding a hearing to determine the mental competency of an inmate sentenced to death before Atkins v. [read post]
12 May 2009, 12:20 pm
At the core of the NIRA was the idea that low profits in the industrial sectors contributed to the economic instability of those times. [read post]
5 Apr 2009, 1:26 pm
(Editor’s Note: This post is based on a client memorandum by Jonathan C. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 1:02 am
Ohio Judge Rules Pre-emption Still Valid Defense -- Sometimes The American Lawyer Ohio federal Judge Solomon Olivier Jr. has ruled that one class of state law tort claims against drug makers is still pre-empted by federal law, even after the Supreme Court's Wyeth v. [read post]