Search for: "Court v. Administrative Office"
Results 401 - 420
of 14,554
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Aug 2012, 9:44 pm
With the above in mind, here is a link to the interesting decision in Faisel v Lancashire County Council, Preston County Court (25 May 2012) concerning the situation where the original firm of solicitors ceases to act following them going into administration. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 10:30 pm
Oral argument was held the following day before a panel of this Court. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 1:42 pm
However, the case at issue, Fowler et al. v. [read post]
3 May 2021, 8:19 am
These briefs were filed during the Trump Administration and involved substantial cooperation between the SG’s office and the USPTO. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 4:00 am
The court noted that usually parties must exhaust their administrative remedies before appealing to the courts; however, a petitioner need not exhaust administrative remedies and may bring a declaratory judgment action to challenge the decisions of municipal officers and boards when the action raises a question that is peculiarly suited to judicial rather than administrative treatment and no other adequate remedy is available. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 4:00 am
The court noted that usually parties must exhaust their administrative remedies before appealing to the courts; however, a petitioner need not exhaust administrative remedies and may bring a declaratory judgment action to challenge the decisions of municipal officers and boards when the action raises a question that is peculiarly suited to judicial rather than administrative treatment and no other adequate remedy is available. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 2:36 pm
Ruttenberg v. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 2:00 am
More than 125 days later, the Supreme Court overruled Dennison in Puerto Rico v. [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 5:16 pm
By Lee DavisUnited States v. [read post]
24 Nov 2024, 2:54 pm
Congress in 1946 enacted the APA “as a check upon administrators whose zeal might otherwise have carried them to excesses not contemplated in legislation creating their offices. [read post]
21 Jan 2021, 10:00 pm
As one of his first actions in office, President Joe Biden has issued an executive order ensuring that last year’s US Supreme Court decision in Bostock v. [read post]
21 Jan 2021, 10:00 pm
As one of his first actions in office, President Joe Biden has issued an executive order ensuring that last year’s US Supreme Court decision in Bostock v. [read post]
21 Jan 2021, 10:00 pm
As one of his first actions in office, President Joe Biden has issued an executive order ensuring that last year’s US Supreme Court decision in Bostock v. [read post]
21 Jan 2021, 10:00 pm
As one of his first actions in office, President Joe Biden has issued an executive order ensuring that last year’s US Supreme Court decision in Bostock v. [read post]
21 Jan 2021, 10:00 pm
As one of his first actions in office, President Joe Biden has issued an executive order ensuring that last year’s US Supreme Court decision in Bostock v. [read post]
21 Jan 2021, 10:00 pm
As one of his first actions in office, President Joe Biden has issued an executive order ensuring that last year’s US Supreme Court decision in Bostock v. [read post]
18 May 2022, 2:47 pm
The court concludes that administrative law judges are officers exercising substantial policy discretion, and thus cannot be regarded as mere inferior officers doubly insulated from presidential removal. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 4:15 am
In Newbrough v. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 4:06 am
District Court Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly issued an opinion in CREW v. [read post]
4 Sep 2024, 7:30 am
The court explained "[M]andamus will lie against an administrative officer only to compel him or her to perform a legal duty". [read post]
