Search for: "Cox v. Long"
Results 401 - 420
of 437
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Sep 2008, 8:21 pm
In their 2006 decision of AFSCME v. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 2:33 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Australian Review of National Innovation System released: (IPRoo), (Mallesons Stephen Jaques), (creativecommons.org), (IP Menu News), Senate Committee on the Judiciary approval of Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights Act 2008 and surrounding debate (Law360), (Public Knowledge), (Ars Technica), (Wired), (Public Knowledge), (Ars Technica),… [read post]
18 Aug 2008, 12:04 am
For too long, members of Congress have shirked the responsibility to ensure fair lending to credit card customers and have listened more intently to the banking lobbyists. [read post]
27 Jul 2008, 3:27 pm
In Wilkes v. [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 6:33 pm
Janine Cox won in State v. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 12:12 pm
See, e.g., Cox v. [read post]
7 May 2008, 4:39 pm
National Pride at Work v. [read post]
4 May 2008, 3:10 pm
If you don't need a refresher in any of these areas, you can safely begin reading at Section V on page 448, which discusses the Cox Commission's recommendations. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 4:22 am
In Levitt Corp. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 6:51 pm
" Mordenti v. [read post]
9 Feb 2008, 3:44 am
Judge Cox was certainly the master of the animal metaphor. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 7:33 pm
Ohio; Cox v. [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 9:30 am
One of the cases she cited, of which I was previously unaware, was Minor v. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 9:24 pm
See, Cox v. [read post]
3 Feb 2008, 10:42 pm
A letter from shareholders to the Honorable Christopher Cox, requesting a return to the pre-1990 interpretation of the Rule, stressed an important distinction: ". . . between using a shareholder resolution as a back-door device to contest a specific election and using a shareholder resolution in order to change the rules for election so as to further the long-term interests of shareholders. [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 10:09 am
Cox, alluding to the AFSCME v. [read post]
14 Dec 2007, 1:25 pm
Sullivan v. [read post]
7 Dec 2007, 5:15 am
The Agency substantially revised the proxy rules after the DC Circuit's decision in SEC v. [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 7:33 am
" "Shareholder rights face a long uphill battle with this commission," Nazareth said. [read post]
21 Nov 2007, 5:15 am
He also raised the specter that the Second Circuit's seemingly clear decision was rendered doubtful by a subsequent Supreme Court decision in Long Island Care v. [read post]
