Search for: "Crawford, Appeal of" Results 401 - 420 of 1,182
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Sep 2012, 6:00 am by Michael B. Stack
Hoberman has been named senior vice president of business development for Broadspire, a Crawford Company and leading third party administrator of workers compensation claims, liability claims and medical management services. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 12:14 pm by Kiran Bhat
” Briefly: Adam Liptak of The New York Times reports on the “extraordinary lengths” to which the Court goes to get ready for last-minute appeals for stays of execution. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 1:39 pm by Lyle Denniston
   The court rejected that argument, saying that, while the Supreme Court ruling (in Crawford v. [read post]
25 Aug 2012, 2:36 am by rickgeorges
Samsung patent case, expect nobody to truly win - Susan Crawford. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 3:45 am by Russ Bensing
In the courts of appeals… In State v. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 8:50 am by Randall Hodgkinson
Terry Mishmash, No. 103,158 (Crawford)Sentencing appeal (petition for review)Lydia Krebs     1. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 3:45 am by Russ Bensing
Cannada, where the appeal argues manifest weight. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 3:54 am by Russ Bensing
In the courts of appeals… In State v. [read post]
29 Jul 2012, 1:15 pm
" Scalia went comically snobby: SCALIA: He is a court of the appeals judge, isn't he? [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 7:31 pm by appealattorneylaw
Criminal defense and appeals attorneys will be glad to see a couple of good opinions released by the 4th DCA this week. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 8:42 pm by Rick Hasen
Supreme Court did in the Crawford case considering the constitutionality of the Indiana voter id law against federal constitutional challenge). [read post]
15 Jul 2012, 8:02 pm by Zachary Spilman
This burden – that the appellant must demonstrate the prejudice in cases involving plain error – is clearly established in Supreme Court precedent: When the defendant has made a timely objection to an error and Rule 52(a) [preserved error] applies, a court of appeals normally engages in a specific analysis of the district court record-a so-called “harmless error” inquiry-to determine whether the error was prejudicial. [read post]