Search for: "Creative Marketing v. AT&T" Results 401 - 420 of 987
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Sep 2008, 11:45 pm
Margaret Atwood on creativity (Michael Geist) National Graduate Caucus on copyright reform (Michael Geist) Supreme Court dismisses auto parts resellers' leave to appeal in action seeking expungement of trade marks for non-distinctiveness and abandonment: Hyundai Auto Canada v Cross Canada Auto Body Supply (West) Ltd &;amp; Ors (Canadian Trademark Blog) 'Why copyright? [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 8:59 am by WIMS
 Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> Delta Construction Company v. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 8:44 pm
Since the Supreme Court's 1834 opinion in Wheaton v. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 12:38 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Endorsement by Monroe means something v. different from endorsement by ABG but courts have refused to distinguish those things. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 5:00 am
(IP Osgoode) Changes to Canada&rsquo;s bankruptcy laws &ndash; IP licences and bankruptcy (ipblog.ca) &nbsp; China China Appeals WTO DS 363 about market access of copyrighted goods (IP Dragon) &nbsp; Europe ECJ: Be circumspect about your salami: Alberto Severi, in his own name and representing Cavazzuti e figli SpA, now known as Grandi Salumifici Italiani SpA v Regione Emilia-Romagna (IPKat) CFI: shape of handle not distinctive:… [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 1:06 am by Jani Ihalainen
The UK case of Express Newspapers Plc. v Liverpool Daily Post & Echo Plc discussed the creation of works with computers programs, and determined that "... [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 5:01 am by Terry Hart
He didn’t, however, need to copy material expression from any existing works. [read post]
“Not only is D&I good for business, it is who we are as a V Team and how we show up in the communities where we do business. [read post]
“Not only is D&I good for business, it is who we are as a V Team and how we show up in the communities where we do business. [read post]
3 May 2007, 7:36 am
By Professor Shubha Ghosh Now that the Supreme Court has issued its opinion in KSR v. [read post]
30 Apr 2021, 7:52 am by INFORRM
AWQC’s submissions on this point included the following: Unlike Warby J, the Court of Appeal disregarded binding case law which restricts the availability of representative actions for damages (notably Duke of Bedford v Ellis [1901] AC 1 and Markt & Co. [read post]