Search for: "DALE v. STATE" Results 401 - 420 of 932
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 May 2014, 2:29 pm
Like last week’s similar decision by a federal court in Idaho, today’s ruling is part of a growing trend of state and federal court invalidations of laws banning same-sex marriage since the Supreme Court decided United States v. [read post]
19 May 2014, 1:50 pm
Counting both federal and state court decisions, it’s the seventeenth consecutive judicial win for same-sex marriage advocates since the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
18 May 2014, 9:01 pm by Ronald D. Rotunda
In 1943, the Court in West Virginia State Board of Education v. [read post]
15 May 2014, 6:53 pm by Lisa Milam-Perez
Horton, Inc v NLRB as the agency moved to invalidate employers’ mandatory arbitration agreements gave its seal of approval to the Board’s rejection of a nonunion company’s handbook rule in what, incidentally, had been a divided decision below. [read post]
14 May 2014, 10:57 am by Jaclyn Belczyk
Citing the US Supreme Court's recent decision in US v. [read post]
13 May 2014, 9:09 pm
As the AP story quoted above points out, this is just one of many federal and state judicial rulings striking down laws banning same-sex marriage issued since the federal Supreme Court decided United States v. [read post]
13 May 2014, 7:50 pm by Lyle Denniston
  And, like the others, she relied to a considerable degree on the reasoning of the Supreme Court last June in United States v. [read post]
13 May 2014, 5:41 pm by Ruthann Robson
Otter, federal judge Candy Wagahoff Dale concluded that Idaho's statutory and state constitutional bans on same-sex marriage violated the... [read post]
13 May 2014, 10:21 am by Lyle Denniston
” In reciting the legal reasons in favor of a “conditional” stay of any decision by Judge Dale against the Idaho ban, the governor’s attorneys read the Supreme Court’s decision last June in the case of United States v. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm by Ronald D. Rotunda
That is what the Court said in Buckley v. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 1:21 pm by DMLP Staff
MoveOn.org claimed that the plaintiff could not do this because no reasonable person viewing the advertisement, which was harshly critical of the state, could believe the billboard was conveying a message from the state itself. [read post]