Search for: "DARE v. STATE" Results 401 - 420 of 738
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2013, 12:34 am
Old Hong Kong v New Hong Kong here, here and here Hong Kong IPD here Hong Kong alley cat adoptions here [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 4:11 am by Clark
Chicago – 561 U.S. 3025 of 2010, and specifically the case of United States v. [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 10:46 am by royblack
” Words of wisdom from Justice Hugo Black as codified in Gideon v. [read post]
3 Feb 2013, 4:00 am by Administrator
The parties had an agreement regarding damages, although it was left for the court to determine Paniccia’s likely age of retirement, when, if ever he could have returned to work and his household duties, and his life expectancy … Dares et al. v. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 4:46 pm
All right -- normally I do not engage laypersons who are ignorant of the law, but in this case (because so many people are being misled), I shall make an exception to that policy. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 5:26 pm by Ann Marie Marciarille
Arizona's original AHCCS waiver, for example, was to include all state employees in its program -- a daring proposal that has not survived implementation. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 4:59 pm by VALL Blog Master
Choice, v.50, no. 06, February 2013. [read post]
1 Jan 2013, 5:42 pm
The AmeriKat ready to pounce on any jolly intruderthat dare touch her Christmas tree It has been an embarrassingly long time since the AmeriKat has stretched her US paws, owing mainly to becoming the UnitaryPatKat for much of the past year. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 10:04 am
In the cut-throat market for flowerdelivery, competitors resortto increasingly daring ploys ... [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 2:23 pm by Jeff Gamso
  How dare he not express remorse for killing Winda Snipes, a crime he claimed not to have committed! [read post]
10 Nov 2012, 8:24 am
This weekend, I had the pleasure of attending the ADR Works in Progress conference at The Ohio State University Moritz College of Law. [read post]
11 Oct 2012, 4:04 pm
This legislative history is narrated in DPP v Collins (para 6), a very interesting decision on s 127, involving a man who made repeated  telephone to his local MP's office asking for him to do something about the "black bastards" - or similar terms. [read post]