Search for: "DC v. Minor" Results 401 - 420 of 428
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Mar 2008, 2:14 pm
Both the TC and DC questioned her at the deposition. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 1:23 pm
About 49% of victims under the age of 6 are abused by family members and only 7% of sex crimes against minors are perpetrated by strangers (Bureau of Justice Statistics, 2000). [read post]
26 Nov 2007, 7:49 am
Box 308 Faribault, MN 55021-0308 Phone: (507) 332-5491 (V/TTY); (800) 657-3936 (V/TTY/Toll Free) DEAF, Inc. 413 Wacouta Street Suite 300 St. [read post]
21 Nov 2007, 10:38 am
Sprague ("Mother") appeals the trial court's order to change the surname of her minor child, S.A.S. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 10:46 am
"He disagreed with the appeals court ruling last March in the Parker v. [read post]
10 Nov 2007, 10:07 pm
APFEL KENTUCKY DEPARTMENT OFJENNER & BLOCK LLP PUBLIC ADVOCACY601 13th Street N.W. 100 Fair Oaks Lane, Ste. 301 Washington, DC 20005 Frankfort, KY 40601(202) 639-6000 (502) 564-3948 November 5, 2007 *Counsel of Record I. [read post]
19 Aug 2007, 10:45 pm
According to the CATO INSTITUTE the DC Circuit Court of Appeals' ruling in Abigail Alliance for Better Access to Developmental Drugs v. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 8:45 am
The following commentary is by Nicole Elam, a student at Howard Law School and a summer associate in Akin Gump's DC office. [read post]
2 Jul 2007, 9:53 am
The following analysis was written by Eric Dreiband, a Labor and Employment partner in Akin Gump's DC office. [read post]
18 May 2007, 2:50 pm
But he seems the most enthusiastic about leaving; he never embraced the job (or Washington, DC) as a lifetime commitment. [read post]
18 May 2007, 2:50 pm
But he seems the most enthusiastic about leaving; he never embraced the job (or Washington, DC) as a lifetime commitment. [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 7:15 am
Fogelman of Ford & Harrison, LLP, Washington, DC. [read post]
22 Apr 2007, 4:39 am
Preemption is a big deal: The feds have tried to preempt state regulation of financial markets, as in Watters v. [read post]