Search for: "DEAL v. DEAL" Results 401 - 420 of 43,626
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jul 2020, 6:38 am by John Jascob
In the case of Jarden, the chancery court reasoned that the deal price was an unreliable indicator of fair value because Jarden’s CEO acted with little oversight and volunteered an acceptable price range before negotiations really began (Fir Tree Value Master Fund, LP v. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 2:28 pm
Catherine Ascani, Casenote, Deal or No Deal: It's a Deal in Morgan Stanley Capital Group, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Nov 2007, 9:18 am
I requested that each of the parties in the election contest, Cooper v. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 10:04 am
Family Law Week has reported the case of Whitehouse-Piper v Stokes [2008] EWCA Civ 1049, which deals with the dreaded 'remarriage trap' in s.28(3) MCA.The Facts: The parties were divorced in 1994, the wife remarried in 1995 and the husband in 2004. [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 6:00 am
A restraint of trade clause seeks to restrict the freedom of a person to trade or deal in specified ways with assets, information or third parties. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 9:45 am by Don T. Hibner, Jr.
Perhaps the origin of modern exclusive dealing analysis is the Standard Station case of 1949, Standard Oil Co. of California v. [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 11:33 am
Ninth Circuit Limits Survival Clause in Deal Governed by California Law As noted in this memo, in what the court described as "an issue of first impression" - in Western Filter Corporation v. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 10:03 am by Nicholas Gebelt
In the Genesis account of the Fall, when the Lord asked Adam if he had sinned by eating of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, Adam immediately pointed the finger at his wife, Eve, as the cause of his disobedience:  “And the man said, The woman whom thou gavest to be with me, she gave me of the tree, and I did eat. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 12:32 pm
On October 9, 2007, the Court will hear oral arguments in Watson v. [read post]
14 May 2023, 9:48 pm by Patent Docs
This has not surprisingly generated a great deal of interest and amicus briefing. [read post]
11 May 2023, 9:11 pm by Patent Docs
This has not surprisingly generated a great deal of interest and amicus briefing. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 8:25 am by Howard Knopf
 I watched with great interest the two-day summary judgment hearing on January 17 and 18, 2024 in Province of Alberta et al v. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 3:30 pm by Stephen J. Natoli
Roberson Burney, a case dealing with complex issues of evidence admissibility and the potential for cumulative error during a trial. [read post]