Search for: "DEAL v. DEAL"
Results 401 - 420
of 43,641
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Apr 2024, 4:38 am
Thus far, since UPC Court of Appeal has mainly been dealing with procedural questions, it has taken the position that it would be composed of only three Legally Qualified Judges (LQJs) - even though Article 9(1) UPCA provides that "Any panel of the Court of Appeal shall sit in a multinational composition of five judges. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 4:22 am
” Pennsylvania: Statutory Default Provisions Codifying “Pick Your Partner” Principle Defeat Claims by Assignee of 50% LLC Membership Interest If the court’s decision in DiDonato can be likened to an easy basketball layup, the Pennsylvania Superior Court’s recent decision in Larikov, LLC v Cao (read here) equates to a slam dunk. [read post]
6 Apr 2024, 6:30 am
In Ap-Fonden v. [read post]
6 Apr 2024, 6:30 am
In Ap-Fonden v. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
Hall notes that under the test Justice Gorsuch articulates in his Gundy v. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 5:31 pm
[FN2] See, e.g., Ferens v. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 8:57 am
See Bragdon v. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 8:05 am
Parker and Kelo v. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 1:00 am
This is its newsletter dealing with recent developments in the field. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 11:15 am
Li v. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 6:16 am
Greene v. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 3:26 am
Vazquez was undeniably willing to strike that deal. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 12:15 am
Palkon v. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 10:30 pm
The ICJ Order in South Africa v Israel On 26 January 2024, the ICJ delivered its landmark Order indicating provisional measures in South Africa v Israel. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
But it does mean that the analytical framework—the test—for whether something is an “investment contract” is the same whether we’re dealing with transactions involving crypto products or with transactions involving the many other kinds of offerings that courts have analyzed under Howey.[6] Nevertheless, over the past decade, we have confronted significant non-compliance and many, many creative attempts by market participants to avoid our jurisdiction, with some… [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 4:10 pm
For instance, in Caparos v. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 4:08 pm
Fact: Peer review generally will catch something that is completely out of step with majority thinking at the time, but it is practically useless for catching outright fraud, and it is not very good at dealing with truly novel ideas. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 4:00 am
In Brown v. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 3:13 am
Quebec Maritime ServicesThe other two cases deal with interjurisdictional immunity. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
New Section 261(a)(1) is being added in light of Crispo v. [read post]