Search for: "DISTRIBUTED SOLUTIONS V. UNITED STATES "
Results 401 - 420
of 566
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Feb 2020, 5:50 pm
The employer-side bar has succeeded in the United States Supreme Court to sustain such provisions. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 4:17 am
” The platform has been designed to do a number of things that current blockchains and centralized working solutions (i.e. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 10:48 am
In Northington v. [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court’s ruling in Bostock v. [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 9:03 pm
Under the policy, non-Mexican asylum applicants who enter the United States at the nation’s southern border must wait in Mexico while their applications are processed. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 1:21 pm
Regardless, however, the Regulations state that for purposes of calculating these numbers, retirees and beneficiaries continuing coverage under the group medical coverage continuation rules generally count. [read post]
20 Dec 2008, 3:00 am
gain upper hand in Blu-ray DRM battle (Ars Technica) Africa South African Times report on state of African music, lack of support and protection (Afro-IP) Australia Australian Copyright Tribunal: consumer valuation of copyright: Audio-Visual Copyright Society (t/a Screenrights) v Foxtel and Re PPCA (IPKat) (IP finance) Innovation patents in Australia. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 8:02 am
” United States v. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 2:18 am
Supreme Court stated in its 2010 Citizens United v. [read post]
20 Jun 2010, 9:17 pm
United States v. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 1:40 am
Under the Act, the FDA must approve all new drugs before such drugs may be distributed in interstate commerce. 21 U.S.C. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 3:00 am
The Project is owned and operated by the United States Bureau of Reclamation (“Bureau”) and discharges significant quantities of selenium and other pollutants into state and federal wildlife refuges leading into the Delta. [read post]
13 May 2024, 7:36 am
As I wrote back in December, scraping claims are almost always about unwanted copying and distribution of data. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog) Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 11:56 am
Cleary highlighted the situation in the United States, having first-hand knowledge of the issues there in her role at IFTA. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 5:54 pm
In United States v. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 10:03 pm
” Most of the surface waters of the United States will fail the generic E. coli standard either persistently, predictably during certain times of the year or intermittently. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 11:29 am
Supreme Court Decision, Lingle v. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 4:22 am
For example, investment subsidies were the subject of a brief piece (Hufbauer, Moll, Rubini, 2008) co-written by one of the respondents to the White Paper which interestingly included many of the points and solutions now presented and already proposed a multilateral compact as an alternative to unilateral action. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 9:53 pm
Given the gravity of the situation with outbreaks from fresh iceberg lettuce and spinach in recent years, it is imperative to examine carefully these challenges, and potential solutions including food irradiation. [read post]
