Search for: "DISTRIBUTED SOLUTIONS V. UNITED STATES "
Results 401 - 420
of 566
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jul 2012, 2:00 am
United States: In People v. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 11:45 am
v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 12:15 pm
What is new is the careful drafting Lasater brings to the proposed solution. [read post]
20 May 2012, 6:16 am
Lewow v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 12:58 pm
JERICHO STATE CAPITAL CORP. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 8:52 am
It does come down to protection v. exercise. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 12:58 am
The general message from the most recent reports is that while some areas have improved, the overall quality of health care in the United States is suboptimal. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 4:05 am
Imagine the following scenario:-- Congress decides that carrot consumption is very important, and accordingly offers the states carrots to distribute to needy citizens, largely at federal expense.-- The States naturally accept the carrots, and distribute them on the terms Congress prescribes, for over forty years. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:42 pm
” (United States v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 5:15 am
It must uphold the principles of the Constitution of the United States. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 5:05 am
In connection with researching, filing and prosecuting certain patent applications, McDonnell made and/or distributed to the United States Patent and Trademark Office ("PTO"), and perhaps others, unauthorized copies of copyrighted articles from plaintiffs' journals … Such unauthorized copies were used for the commercial benefit of defendants and their clients. 15. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 3:30 am
A Very Large Opinion The Eleventh Circuit's opinion in United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 5:05 pm
’s small claims court, the automaker has been hit with a class-action lawsuit out of the Golden State. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 3:41 pm
” See FCC v. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 2:18 am
Supreme Court stated in its 2010 Citizens United v. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 8:24 am
I’ve just finished reading the fascinating case of AMP v Persons Unknown [2011] EWHC 3454 (TCC) via the IP Osgoode blog. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 4:05 pm
Any State Party to the present Covenant availing itself of the right of derogation shall immediately inform the other States Parties to the present Covenant, through the intermediary of the Secretary-General of the United Nations, of the provisions from which it has derogated and of the reasons by which it was actuated. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 8:46 am
Zimmerman, Distributing Justice, 86 N.Y.U. 500 (2011) (describing potential solutions). [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 11:53 am
Apple was not successful in obtaining an injunction against distribution of Samsung’s Galaxy Tab in the United States, although the judge stated that Apple’s design patents might be infringed. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 12:34 pm
., Ltd. v. [read post]
