Search for: "DOES 1-121"
Results 401 - 420
of 1,229
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jun 2018, 2:06 pm
City of Deltona, 121 So. 3d 1094, 1097 (Fla. 5th DCA 2013) (citing GTC, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 2:06 pm
City of Deltona, 121 So. 3d 1094, 1097 (Fla. 5th DCA 2013) (citing GTC, Inc. v. [read post]
14 May 2018, 9:30 pm
” Article I of the Constitution does not specify the “process for repealing a statute,” they note, but it is understood that Congress may repeal a statute with a new law. [read post]
13 May 2018, 4:01 am
The S.C.C. held the impediment to trade posed by s. 134(b) is an incidental effect of a regulatory scheme that does not, as its primary purpose, thwart interprovincial trade, and so does not infringe s. 121. [read post]
9 May 2018, 8:34 am
| Google cannot hide behind its algorithms, German court finds | Does the InfoSoc Directive envisage digital exhaustion? [read post]
8 May 2018, 9:01 pm
The last national count on May 1 reported 121 confirmed cases and one death with 25 states included in the outbreak, according to the CDC. [read post]
8 May 2018, 3:34 pm
As of May 2, the CDC reported 121 cases from 25 states, Alaska (8), Arizona (8), California (24), Colorado (2), Connecticut (2), Georgia (4), Idaho (11), Illinois (1), Kentucky (1), Louisiana (1), Massachusetts (2), Michigan (4), Mississippi (1), Missouri (1), Montana (8), New Jersey (7), New York (2), Ohio (3), Pennsylvania (20), South Dakota (1), Tennessee (1), Utah (1), Virginia (1), Washington (6), and… [read post]
7 May 2018, 4:00 am
Comeau,[1] made headlines because of its sudsy subject matter: Does s. [read post]
4 May 2018, 11:58 pm
Here are five key issues California employers must understand about the ruling: 1. [read post]
3 May 2018, 11:23 am
For example lying to Medicare does not constitute any breach of public trust. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 2:31 pm
The Injunction Unconstitutionally Forbids Protected Speech About a Person That Does Not Fall Within One of the Narrow Categories of Restrictable Speech [A.] [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 4:48 am
This case concerned an SPC Gilead had obtained for the combination of tenofovir and emtricitabine based upon Gilead’s patent, which claimed “A pharmaceutical composition comprising a compound according to any one of claims 1 to 25 together with a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier and optionally other therapeutic ingredients”. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 4:00 am
Fundamentally, does s. 121 constitutionalize some particular form of economic union? [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 3:05 am
The AmeriKat working off her impatience while awaitingthis morning's Article 3(a) OpinionThis morning Advocate General Wathelet handed down his opinion in the reference from Mr Justice Arnold in Teva v Gilead (Case C-121/17) concerning Article 3(a) of the SPC Regulation. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 8:28 am
Both permissive and restrictive regimes exist across all three categories; the existence of some sort of property tax cap does not necessarily impose an effective restraint on property tax increases. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 11:29 am
What does it mean for articles to be “admitted free” as stated in s. 121 ? [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 4:17 am
§ 29-26-121. [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 9:57 am
Table 1. [read post]
1 Apr 2018, 4:00 am
R., 2017 CMAC 2 (37701) Does s.130 (1)(a) of the National Defence Act violate s. 11(f) of the Charter. [read post]
30 Mar 2018, 6:57 am
The intention to authorise debiting of the deposit account does NOT already allow the EPO to act on such authorisation and carry out such intent where the EPO, under the deposit account system, already holds such money in trust (deviation in particular from T 1265/10, at point 15), (see point 3.4.3 of the quotation from the summons under point 1 of the Reasons).2. [read post]
